Oregon Medical Marijuana  Program       


OR

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Syndrome)

 My personal testimonial if IBS/IBD

Just a personal note from me, I suffered from IBS for 12 years and know the pain very well. That is until a year ago (March 2008) when Tom recommended me taking a product he has called ADP. After 2 months of taking 2 supplements twice a day my digestive system had totally improved, and I have only had 2 bouts of IBS since In fact after just 2 weeks I had increased appetite, more energy, and more of a zest for life. Having dealt with IBS attacks 2-3 times a week for 12 years, Tom  was a God send in my life, and I do believe now that your gut/intestinal tract is the center of your health. You can reach him through his website at http://stchiropractic.com/ . There he has a Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, copy it out and answer the questions as I did and get it to him, I am so happy I did. The lil' time it took me to answer the questions has saved me a year of pain.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Cannabis-based drugs could offer new hope for inflammatory bowel disease patients

Main Category: Irritable-Bowel Syndrome
Article Date: 04 Aug 2005 - 0:00 PDT


Researchers investigating anecdotal evidence that cannabis relieves some of the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have discovered a potential new target for cannabis-derived drugs for treatment of the disease.

This finding, published in the journal Gastroenterology today (Monday 1 August), could bring new hope for the UK's 90,000 - 180,000 sufferers of diseases like Crohn's and ulcerative colitis1 with the possibility that cannabis-derived drugs may help to heal the gut lining, which is damaged during the course of disease.

Both Crohn's and ulcerative colitis - often referred to under the umbrella term of IBD - cause patients' immune systems to go into overdrive, producing inflammation in different areas of the gastrointestinal tract.

This inflammation can cause pain, urgent diarrhoea, severe tiredness and loss of weight, and is most commonly diagnosed in young adults of both sexes between the ages of 15 and 25.

Patients with IBD who are also users of cannabis often report that their symptoms are alleviated following cannabis use, suggesting that the gut is able to respond to some of the molecules found in cannabis.

Investigating this phenomenon, researchers from the University of Bath worked with colleagues at the Royal United Hospital in Bath to look at the interaction of cannabis with specific molecules, known as receptors, found on the surface of cells in the gut.

Examining gut samples from healthy people and IBD patients, the researchers looked at two specific receptors, called CB1 and CB2, which are known to be activated by the presence of molecules found in cannabis.

They discovered that whilst CB1 is present in healthy people, the presence of CB2 increases in IBD patients as their disease progresses.

The researchers believe that the presence of CB2 receptor only during the disease-state may be linked to its known role in suppression of the immune system. In other words, it is part of the body's natural mechanisms that attempt to restore the normal healthy state of the gut.

If so, this makes it an ideal candidate for the development of new cannabis-derived drugs to help IBD patients. They also found that the CB1 receptor helps to promote wound healing in the lining of the gut.

"This gives us the first evidence that very selective cannabis-derived treatments may be useful as future therapeutic strategies in the treatment of Crohn's and ulcerative colitis," said Dr Karen Wright from the University's Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology.

"This is because some extracts from cannabis, known as cannabinoids, closely resemble molecules that occur naturally in our body, and by developing treatments that target this system, we can help the body recover from some of the effects of these diseases."

Ordinarily, CB1 and CB2 have the task of recognising and binding to a family of substances called "endocannabinoids" that occur naturally in our bodies. Once these receptors have detected the presence of specific molecules in their surrounding environment, a chain of biochemical signals is activated which culminates in switching immune responses on or off - depending on what their function is.

"The normal job of the CB1 and CB2 receptors is to help moderate diverse responses throughout the body, but their presence in the gut means that they could be useful targets for the development of cannabis-derived drugs for controlling the progression of IBD," said Dr Wright.

"The research shows that whilst cannabis use may have some benefits for patients with IBD, the psychoactive effects and the legal implications associated with herbal cannabis use make it unsuitable as a treatment. Targeting drug development to components of the in-built cannabinoid system could be the way forward."

Cannabis-based medicines that help alleviate the pain endured by Multiple Sclerosis patients have already been given a licence for use in Canada, and Salisbury-based GW Pharmaceuticals is pioneering many of the advances in this field.

The research was funded by the Wellcome Trust and an NHS Research Grant.

Case studies of people with colitis or Crohn's are available from National Association for Colitis and Crohn's Disease on +44 (0)1727 830038.

1Figures from the National Association for Colitis and Crohn's Disease. There is no national database of people with Crohn's or Colitis - the figures are taken from estimates published by the British Society for Gastroenterology in 2004.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

� Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is an umbrella term referring to two chronic diseases that cause inflammation of the intestines: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD).

Crohn's disease

� Between 30,000 and 60,000 people in the UK live with CD. Between 3,000 and 6,000 new cases are diagnosed each year.

� In 1996, a study from South Glamorgan reported a doubling of the number of children diagnosed with CD between 1983 and 1993

� In 1999 a study of children in Scotland has reported a 50% increase over 10 years in the incidence of CD.

� CD can affect anywhere from the mouth to the rectum but most commonly affects the small intestine.

� It causes inflammation, deep ulcers and scarring to the wall of the intestine and often occurs in patches with healthy tissue in between. There is no cure for CD at present.

� The main symptoms are pain, urgent diarrhoea, severe tiredness and loss of weight.

� CD is quite often associated with other inflammatory conditions affecting the joints, skin and eyes. Most patients will be treated with drugs, including steroids, to reduce inflammation or by means of special liquid feeds to rest the bowel. Surgery may be required to remove narrowed or damaged parts of the intestine.

� The condition is named after Dr Burril Crohn, one of the three doctors who first identified the disease in 1932. � The cause of CD has not yet been identified.

Ulcerative Colitis

� Between 60,000 and 120,000 people in the United Kingdom live with UC

� Between 6,000 and 12,000 new cases are diagnosed each year.

� Ulcerative Colitis affects men and women equally.

� The number of new cases each year has not risen recently, but is not decreasing.

� Ulcerative Colitis affects the colon (large intestine) or rectum. Inflammation and ulcers develop on the inside lining of the colon resulting in pain, urgent and bloody diarrhoea, and continual tiredness.

� There is no cure for Ulcerative Colitis at present.

� The condition varies as to how much of the colon is affected and the severity of the symptoms also fluctuates unpredictably over time. Patients are likely to experience flare-ups in between intervals of reduced symptoms or remission.

� Most patients will be treated with drugs, including steroids, to control or reduce the inflammation. Some people need surgery to remove the affected part of the colon, if their symptoms do not respond to treatment with drugs.

� The cause of UC has not yet been identified. The University of Bath is one of the UK's leading universities, with an international reputation for quality research and teaching. In 17 subject areas the University of Bath is rated in the top ten in the country.
source: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/28584.php

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cannabis may soothe inflamed bowels


Cannabis-based drugs could offer treatment hope to sufferers of inflammatory bowel disease, UK researchers report.

Cannabis smokers with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have often claimed that smoking a joint seems to lessen their symptoms. So a group of researchers from Bath University and Bristol University, both in the UK, decided to explore the clinical basis for the claims. "There is quite a lot of anecdotal evidence that using cannabis seems to reduce the pain and frequency of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, so we decided to see if we could find out what was going on there," says Karen Wright, a pharmacologist at Bath University. "Historically, it was smoked in India and China centuries ago for its gastrointestinal properties". The chronic conditions, known collectively as IBD, are caused by an over-active immune system which produces severe inflammation in areas of the gastrointestinal tract. Up to 180,000 people in the UK are thought to have colitis or Crohn’s disease and suffer symptoms of pain, urgent diarrhoea, severe tiredness and loss of weight. Repeated attacks can lead to scarring of the colon and fibrosis to the extent that the bowel narrows to form a stricture, for which a colonectomy - the surgical removal of the bowel - is the only cure.

Repair trigger

Reports that cannabis eased IBD symptoms indicated the possible existence of cannabinoid receptors in the intestinal lining, which respond to molecules in the plant-derived chemicals. Wright and colleagues grew sections of human colon and examined them in vitro. To their surprise, the team discovered CB1 cannabinoid receptors - which are known to be present in the brain - in the endothelial cells which line the gut. "I think they must be involved in repairing the lining of the gut when it is damaged," Wright says. She deliberately damaged the cells to cause inflammation of the gut lining and then added synthetically produced cannabinoids."The gut started to heal: the broken cells were repaired and brought back closer together to mend the tears," she told New Scientist. Wright believes that in a healthy gut, natural endogenous cannabinoids are released from endothelial cells when they are injured, which then bind to the CB1 receptors. The process appears to set off a wound-healing reaction. "When people use cannabis, the cannabinoids bind to these receptors in the same way," she said.

Excess cells

Previous studies have shown that CB1 receptors located on the nerve cells in the gut respond to cannabinoids by slowing gut motility, therefore reducing the painful muscle contractions associated with diarrhoea. But Wright and her team also discovered another cannabinoid receptor, CB2, in the guts of IBD sufferers, which was not present in healthy guts. These receptors, which also respond to chemicals in cannabis, appear to be associated with apoptosis - programmed cell death - and may have a role in suppressing the overactive immune system and reducing inflammation by moping up excess cells, she suggests. "Ideally we would want to be able to stimulate the body’s own endogenous cannabinoid system, which might become dysregulated during long-term inflammation. Knowing more about how this system actually works will help us to look for therapeutic targets," Wright says. "We are not advocating cannabis use, particularly as smoking tobacco exacerbates Crohn’s disease and many smokers of cannabis use tobacco as well." "Anything that offers hope is good news for sufferers of IBD," says a spokesperson from the National Association for Colitis and Crohn’s Disease, commenting on the research.

Source: http://www.chanvre-info.ch/info/en/Cannabi...e-inflamed.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bowel Study Backs Cannabis Drugs
BBCi, 1st August 2005

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease may benefit from cannabis-based drugs, UK scientists believe. The Bath University team found people with the gut disorder had an abundant number of a type of cannabinoid receptors in their body.

They believe this is part of the body's attempt to dampen down the inflammation and that giving a drug that binds to these receptors could boost this. Their findings appear in the journal Gastroenterology.

Cannabinoids
When people have Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis - collectively known as inflammatory bowel disease or IBD - their immune system goes into overdrive, producing inflammation in different areas of the digestive tract.

This causes symptoms such as pain and urgent diarrhoea.

Anecdotally, people with IBD who have been users of cannabis have reported that their symptoms get better when they use the drug.

" These initial results look extremely promising and exciting." - Dr Derek Scott from Aberdeen University

Dr Karen Wright and colleagues examined gut samples from healthy people and IBD patients and looked for the presence of two receptors known to react to natural cannabis-like compounds produced by the body.

Both the patients and the healthy people had similar numbers of CB1 receptors in their gut. However, the IBD patients had far greater numbers of CB2 receptors.

The normal job of CB1 and CB2 receptors is to switch immune responses on or off. CB1 receptors also help to promote wound healing in the lining of the gut.

Potential Therapy
Dr Wright said: "This gives us the first evidence that very selective cannabis-derived treatments may be useful as future therapeutic strategies in the treatment of Crohn's and ulcerative colitis.

"This is because some extracts from cannabis, known as cannabinoids, closely resemble molecules that occur naturally in our body, and by developing treatments that target this system, we can help the body recover from some of the effects of these diseases."

She said that the psychoactive effects and the legal implications associated with herbal cannabis use made it unsuitable as a treatment.

However, it might be possible to make a synthetic cannabis-like drug that has all of the therapeutic benefits and none of the other actions of cannabis.

"Targeting drug development to components of the in-built cannabinoid system could be the way forward," she said.

Dr Derek Scott, a researcher in Biomedical Sciences at Aberdeen University, said: "These initial results look extremely promising and exciting.

More Trials
"However, further work is required so that we can better understand exactly how the signalling pathways controlled by cannabinoid receptors might be targeted in IBD patients, and whether there might be any side-effects."

Cannabis-based medicines are already used for multiple sclerosis in some countries.

Dr John Zycheck, from the Peninsula Medical School in Plymouth, which has been granted £2 million to study these drugs for MS, said: "There is no reason why clinical studies could not be undertaken at a fairly early stage because we are already testing cannabinoids for a variety of different conditions.

"Cannabinoids do have an effect on the gut. It slows gut transit. We see it in our MS patients."

He said more work was needed to check whether these drugs would reduce inflammation and to work out a dose that was strong enough but not toxic.

Dr George Kunos from the US National Institutes of Health said an alternative approach could involve testing compounds that amplify the action of the body's natural cannabinoids by blocking their normal destruction in the gut.

He said animal studies suggested compounds that block the enzyme fatty acid amidohydrolase (FAAH) do this.

Dr John Bennett, Chairman of Core, a national gut and liver disorders charity, said: "I would not want any patient to think that a cannabis-based treatment for IBD is around the corner. Much more work is needed."

source: http://www.thehempire.com/index.php/cannab..._cannabis_drugs

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

American College of Gastroenterology


Post-Eating Stomach Cramps May Be Alleviated with Chemical Components from Cannabis, According to New Study Findings
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, October 23, 2006 — A chemical component extracted from the cannabis, or marijuana, plant may relax the colon and reduce stomach cramping after eating, according to a study presented at the 71st Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology. The study compared the effects of dronabinol and placebo on colonic motility and sensation in healthy adults.
Doctors at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota conducted a double-blind, parallel-group study of 52 volunteers who were randomly assigned placebo or a single dose of dronabinol, a synthetic THC and a naturally-occurring compound in marijuana, known as a non-selective cannabinoid agonist.
The researchers found that dronabinol relaxes the colon and reduces post-eating contractions and cramping. Further, the effects were most pronounced in females. “The potential for cannabinoids to modulate colonic motor function in disease deserves a further look,” said study leader Tuba Esfandyari, M.D., MSc of the Mayo Clinic.
- more -
Dronabinol and Stomach Motility/2
About the American College of Gastroenterology
The ACG was formed in 1932 to advance the scientific study and medical treatment of disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The College promotes the highest standards in medical education and is guided by its commitment to meeting the needs of clinical gastroenterology practitioners.

 

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cannabidiol, extracted from Cannabis sativa, selectively inhibits inflammatory hypermotility in mice.
Capasso R, Borrelli F, Aviello G, Romano B, Scalisi C, Capasso F, Izzo AA

1Department of Experimental Pharmacology, University of Naples Federico II and Endocannabinoid Research Group, Naples, Italy.


Background and purpose:Cannabidiol is a Cannabis-derived non-psychotropic compound that exerts a plethora of pharmacological actions, including anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective and antitumour effects, with potential therapeutic interest. However, the actions of cannabidiol in the digestive tract are largely unexplored. In the present study, we investigated the effect of cannabidiol on intestinal motility in normal (control) mice and in mice with intestinal inflammation.Experimental approach:Motility in vivo was measured by evaluating the distribution of an orally administered fluorescent marker along the small intestine; intestinal inflammation was induced by the irritant croton oil; contractility in vitro was evaluated by stimulating the isolated ileum, in an organ bath, with ACh.Key results:In vivo, cannabidiol did not affect motility in control mice, but normalized croton oil-induced hypermotility. The inhibitory effect of cannabidiol was counteracted by the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist rimonabant, but not by the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist SR144528 (N-[-1S-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide), by the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone or by the alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist yohimbine. Cannabidiol did not reduce motility in animals treated with the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor N-arachidonoyl-5-hydroxytryptamine, whereas loperamide was still effective. In vitro, cannabidiol inhibited ACh-induced contractions in the isolated ileum from both control and croton oil-treated mice.Conclusions and implications:Cannabidiol selectively reduces croton oil-induced hypermotility in mice in vivo and this effect involves cannabinoid CB(1) receptors and FAAH. In view of its low toxicity in humans, cannabidiol may represent a good candidate to normalize motility in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.British Journal of Pharmacology (2008) 154, 1001-1008; doi:10.1038/bjp.2008.177; published online 12 May 2008.

Published 30 June 2008 in Br J Pharmacol, 154(5): 1001-8.

source: http://marijuana.researchtoday.net/archive/5/6/1797.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cannabinoids and the gut

The plant Cannabis sativa produces a variety of cannabinoid compounds of which 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (9-THC) is the main psychotropic constituent. The effects of 9-THC are thought to be mediated primarily by the mammalian cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 which are G protein-coupled receptors. CB1 receptors are expressed mainly by neurons in the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nervous system, and enteric nervous system. CB2 receptors appear to be expressed mainly by cells of the immune system.

Endogenous ligands for the cannabinoid receptors have been identified; the best known include anandamide (arachidonoyl ethanolamide) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG). When released, anandamide and 2-AG appear to be removed from extracellular compartments by a carrier mediated uptake process, and once within the cell, both endocannabinoids are hydrolyzed by the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), which appears to be a major determinant of physiological levels of both molecules.1 In addition to the 2 cannabinoid receptors, it has recently been shown that anandamide and 2-AG are also agonists for the TRPV1 receptor (transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1; also called VR1), the cognate receptor for the pungent plant compound, capsaicin.2 Therefore, some effects of anandamide and 2-AG may be mediated by TRPV1 receptors instead of CB1 or CB2 receptors.

Evidence has accumulated in recent years that endocannabinoids and their receptors may play a role in inhibiting gastric emptying and intestinal peristalsis (reviewed in Pertwee3). These effects on gastrointestinal motility appear to be mediated primarily by peripheral CB1 receptors that inhibit excitatory transmitter release in the enteric nervous system. Gastric acid secretion is also inhibited by cannabinoid receptor agonists in animals and humans although the mechanisms involved are not yet clear. The cannabinoid receptor antagonists/inverse agonists SR141716A (selective for CB1 receptors) and SR144528 (selective for CB2 receptors) have proven to be very useful tools in the analysis of the actions of the endocannabinoids. The observation that SR141716A administered alone has effects on motility in intestinal preparations in vitro suggests that the endocannabinoid system is active tonically and may affect gut function physiologically. Since SR141716A is both a CB1 receptor antagonist and an inverse agonist, the tonic endocannabinoid activity in the intestine may be due to the presence of a population of CB1 receptors that are precoupled to their effector mechanisms rather than from the endogenous release of endocannabinoids.

The list of potential roles for the endocannabinoid system in the gut is expanded by 2 new reports appearing in this issue of GASTROENTEROLOGY. In the first, evidence is presented that the endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide, exerts an antidiarrheal action in mice treated with oral cholera toxin (CT) to induce secretory diarrhea.4 Selective CB1 receptor agonists produced a dose-dependent and significant inhibition of CT-induced fluid accumulation in the small intestine; this effect, in turn, was inhibited by pretreatment of the mice with the selective CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, SR141716A but not by the selective CB2 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, SR144528. When given to CT-treated animals without CB1 receptor agonists, SR141716A but not SR144528 produced dose-dependent and significant increases in intraluminal fluid accumulation, suggesting that the secretory effects of CT are normally counteracted by endocannabinoid release. In addition, a selective anandamide re-uptake inhibitor, VDM11, significantly prevented CT-induced intraluminal fluid accumulation, providing further evidence in favor of the concept that endogenous cannabinoids inhibit CT-induced secretory diarrhea.

In addition to these pharmacological results, the authors also demonstrated that CT caused increased intestinal levels of anandamide but not 2-AG and that this was not due to a change in the enzymatic hydrolysis of anandamide because CT did not affect the rate of hydrolysis of 14C-anandamide added to small intestinal homogenates. Immunohistochemistry was used to demonstrate CB1 receptor expression in myenteric and submucous neurons that co-expressed choline acetyltransferase, a marker of cholinergic neurons, and semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to show that CB1 transcripts are present in the mouse small intestine and that CB1 transcripts are significantly increased in CT-treated mice compared with controls.

The authors conclude that their data indicate that endogenous anandamide exerts an inhibitory influence on CT-stimulated fluid accumulation in the mouse intestine via activation of up-regulated CB1 receptors on enteric cholinergic nerves. This interpretation is consistent with previous demonstrations that activated CB1 receptors mediate inhibition of evoked acetylcholine release in myenteric neurons3 and suggests that cannabinoid administration to patients may be a way to inhibit selectively cholinergic neurons in the intestine that may be involved in the secretory pathway in diarrhea. The authors suggest that their findings indicate 2 possible novel strategies for pharmacological inhibition of secretory diarrhea without provoking unacceptable side effects such as psychotropic actions. First, development of selective CB1 receptor agonists that do not cross the blood-brain barrier may be expected to inhibit intestinal secretion without concomitant psychotropic effects. Second, administration of inhibitors of endocannabinoid inactivation (such as inhibitors of FAAH or the cellular re-uptake mechanism) might be expected to result in increasing local intestinal concentrations of anandamide to inhibit secretion. It is fascinating to note that this is not a totally new concept—there are several accounts of the effective use of Cannabis to treat dysentery and cholera in the 18th and 19th centuries.5

Another article appearing in this issue describes a potential role of endocannabinoids in colorectal cancer growth inhibition.6 In their introduction, the authors point out that the endocannabinoids and their receptors have previously been reported to inhibit the proliferation of breast cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, and rat thyroid cancer cells. In the current study, colonic mucosal biopsies were obtained from healthy and cancer tissue in patients with left-sided colon carcinoma and from healthy tissue and adenomatous polyps in patients with colonic adenomas. A small piece of tissue was taken from the head of each polyp by snare polypectomy. All tissues were found to contain anandamide, 2-AG, CB1 and CB2 receptors, and FAAH. The levels of anandamide and 2-AG were increased relative to controls in the adenomatous polyps and carcinomas, but there appeared to be no differences in levels of CB1 and CB2 receptors or FAAH among the tissues.

To determine if the endocannabinoid system affects colorectal cancer cell growth, the authors tested the effects of cannabinoids on undifferentiated and differentiated CaCo-2 cells in vitro. Anandamide and 2-AG dose-dependently inhibited the growth of undifferentiated CaCo-2 cells as did selective CB1 receptor agonists; the cannabinoids had little effect on the proliferation of differentiated CaCo-2 cells. In addition, the antiproliferative effects of the cannabinoids were antagonized by SR141716A but not SR144528. CaCo-2 cells were also shown to express CB1 but not CB2 receptors by RT-PCR and Western blotting and contained anandamide, 2-AG, and FAAH. Pharmacological inhibition of the inactivation of endocannabinoids also inhibited proliferation of undifferentiated CaCo-2 cells and this effect was also antagonized by SR141716A.

As the authors point out, this article is apparently the first report that cannabinoid receptors are expressed in nonnervous mammalian intestinal tissue. Coupled with the demonstration of relatively high concentrations of anandamide and 2-AG in colonic polyps and tumors, the authors suggest that local concentrations of these endocannabinoids may be high enough to interact physiologically with CB1 receptors in the tissue resulting in endogenous inhibition of cancer growth. These observations in turn lead the authors to suggest that inhibitors of endocannabinoid inactivation might represent useful anticancer drugs. Whether this proves to be the case or not, this work shows that endocannabinoids can be regarded as potential endogenous tumor growth inhibitors, as well as possible markers for cancer cells. It will be interesting to see in future studies whether cannabinoids or inhibitors of endocannabinoid inactivation are able to affect the proliferation of human colorectal tumors. Perhaps this question could be examined in a nude mouse model, for example.

The potential roles of the endocannabinoid system in gastrointestinal disorders may extend even beyond secretory diarrhea and colorectal cancer. It has been reported in recent studies that endocannabinoids may be involved in intestinal inflammation. In a mouse model of intestinal inflammation induced by oral croton oil administration, cannabinoid receptor agonists were more active in delaying intestinal motility than in control mice and these effects were counteracted by the CB1 selective antagonist/inverse agonist, SR141716A.7 In addition, croton oil-induced intestinal inflammation was associated with an increased expression of the CB1 receptor. It was concluded in this study that gut inflammation increases the potency of cannabinoid agonists possibly by up-regulating CB1 receptor expression. In another model of acute intestinal inflammation induced by administration of toxin A from Clostridium difficile to isolated segments of the rat ileum, it was shown that toxin A treatment resulted in increased ileal concentrations of anandamide and 2-AG and that administration of either anandamide or 2-AG alone essentially duplicated the inflammatory effects of toxin A,8 suggesting that one or both of these endocannabinoids may mediate the inflammatory effects of toxin A. Unlike the findings in the mouse croton oil-induced enteritis model, however, pretreatment with cannabinoid receptor antagonists did not inhibit toxin A-, anandamide-, or 2-AG-induced ileitis. Instead, pretreatment of the rats with the TRPV1 antagonist, capsazepine, significantly inhibited the inflammatory responses to all 3 substances. This finding suggests that endocannabinoids in the gut may act via the vanilloid TRPV1 receptor, as well as the cannabinoid receptors in some cases. It remains for future studies to unravel the perhaps multiple roles of the endocannabinoid/endovanilloid system of the gut in health and disease.

Whether or not the novel gastrointestinal actions of endocannabinoids reported in this issue of GASTROENTEROLOGY and elsewhere stand up to future scrutiny, it seems clear that the influence of these agents on the gut extends beyond the realm of motility. As putative inhibitors of secretory diarrhea and colorectal cancer, the potential therapeutic value of the gut endocannabinoid system appears to be substantial.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bowel Study Backs Cannabis Drugs
July 31, 2005 © BBC News


United Kingdom -- Patients with inflammatory bowel disease may benefit from cannabis-based drugs, UK scientists believe. The Bath University team found people with the gut disorder had an abundant number of a type of Cannabinoid receptors in their body. They believe this is part of the body's attempt to dampen down the inflammation and that giving a drug that binds to these receptors could boost this. Their findings appear in the journal Gastroenterology.

Cannabinoids

When people have Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis - collectively known as inflammatory bowel disease or IBD - their immune system goes into overdrive, producing inflammation in different areas of the digestive tract.

This causes symptoms such as pain and urgent diarrhea.

Anecdotally, people with IBD who have been users of cannabis have reported that their symptoms get better when they use the drug.

"These initial results look extremely promising and exciting." - Dr Derek Scott from Aberdeen University

Dr Karen Wright and colleagues examined gut samples from healthy people and IBD patients and looked for the presence of two receptors known to react to natural cannabis-like compounds produced by the body.

Both the patients and the healthy people had similar numbers of CB1 receptors in their gut. However, the IBD patients had far greater numbers of CB2 receptors.

The normal job of CB1 and CB2 receptors is to switch immune responses on or off. CB1 receptors also help to promote wound healing in the lining of the gut.

Potential Therapy

Dr Wright said: "This gives us the first evidence that very selective cannabis-derived treatments may be useful as future therapeutic strategies in the treatment of Crohn's and ulcerative colitis.

"This is because some extracts from cannabis, known as cannabinoids, closely resemble molecules that occur naturally in our body, and by developing treatments that target this system, we can help the body recover from some of the effects of these diseases."

She said that the psychoactive effects and the legal implications associated with herbal cannabis use made it unsuitable as a treatment.

However, it might be possible to make a synthetic cannabis-like drug that has all of the therapeutic benefits and none of the other actions of cannabis.

"Targeting drug development to components of the in-built cannabinoid system could be the way forward," she said.

Dr Derek Scott, a researcher in Biomedical Sciences at Aberdeen University, said: "These initial results look extremely promising and exciting.

More Trials

"However, further work is required so that we can better understand exactly how the signalling pathways controlled by cannabinoid receptors might be targeted in IBD patients, and whether there might be any side-effects."

Cannabis-based medicines are already used for multiple sclerosis in some countries.

Dr John Zycheck, from the Peninsula Medical School in Plymouth, which has been granted £2 million to study these drugs for MS, said: "There is no reason why clinical studies could not be undertaken at a fairly early stage because we are already testing cannabinoids for a variety of different conditions.

"Cannabinoids do have an effect on the gut. It slows gut transit. We see it in our MS patients."

He said more work was needed to check whether these drugs would reduce inflammation and to work out a dose that was strong enough but not toxic.

Dr George Kunos from the US National Institutes of Health said an alternative approach could involve testing compounds that amplify the action of the body's natural cannabinoids by blocking their normal destruction in the gut.

He said animal studies suggested compounds that block the enzyme fatty acid amidohydrolase (FAAH) do this.

Dr John Bennett, Chairman of Core, a national gut and liver disorders charity, said: "I would not want any patient to think that a cannabis-based treatment for IBD is around the corner. Much more work is needed."

source: http://hempworld.com/HempPharm/articles/bowel.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Previously unknown immune cell may help those with Crohn's and Colitis

By Gwen Ericson


Nov. 3, 2008 -- The tonsils and lymphoid tissues in the intestinal tract that help protect the body from external pathogens are the home base of a rare immune cell newly identified by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. The researchers indicate that the immune cells could have a therapeutic role in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Their report will appear in an upcoming issue of the journal Nature and is currently available through advanced online publication.

"These cells have an anti-inflammatory effect," says the article's lead author Marina Cella, M.D., research associate professor of pathology and immunology. "In the gut, we have beneficial bacteria, and it's important that the body does not recognize them as something detrimental and start an inflammatory reaction, which could ultimately promote tissue damage and inflammatory or autoimmune diseases such as IBD. The cells we've discovered are important for keeping such harmful inflammatory processes in check."

The cells are a type of natural killer (NK) cells, which are white blood cells classically known to eliminate tumor cells and cells infected by viruses. Because of their killer tendencies, NK cells are carefully controlled and don't act until they receive the right signal.

Some of the signals that activate the newly discovered cells are the same signals that turn on a different immune cell with strong inflammatory properties that can promote cell death and tissue damage if chronically active. But the anti-inflammatory cells, termed NK-22 cells, that the Washington University researchers discovered have the opposite effect — they promote cell proliferation and wound healing.

"That finding suggests that these cells play a role in maintaining a balance in the immune system between inflammatory processes and anti-inflammatory processes," says coauthor Jason Mills, M.D., Ph.D., assistant professor of pathology and immunology and of developmental biology. "They make sure that factors that turn up inflammation can be counteracted by the coordinated activation of anti-inflammatory effects."

The NK-22 cells are part of the innate immune system, which reacts quickly to invading pathogens. The researchers found that in response to immune signals warning of foreign invaders, the cells produce copious quantities of a compound called IL-22, which is why the researchers chose to name them NK-22 cells.

"NK-22 cells are already present in the mucosal tissue of the gastrointestinal tract, and as soon as they see a pathogen, they react," Cella says. "That is a great advantage to the body because it produces a protective response in the very first hours of pathogenic attack."

Now that immunologists know NK-22 cells exist and what immune factors influence them, they may be able to capitalize on them to treat a variety of inflammatory diseases, the researchers say.

"Diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease result from a defect in the intestine's protective barrier," says senior author Marco Colonna, M.D., professor of pathology and immunology. "If we can develop methods to culture NK-22 cells, we may be able to use them to promote healing and protect the gastrointestinal tract."



source: http://mednews.wustl.edu/news/page/normal/12892.html"]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cannabinoids and the gastrointestinal tract.

Pertwee RG.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. rgp@aberdeen.ac.uk

The enteric nervous system of several species, including the mouse, rat, guinea pig and humans, contains cannabinoid CB1 receptors that depress gastrointestinal motility, mainly by inhibiting ongoing contractile transmitter release. Signs of this depressant effect are, in the whole organism, delayed gastric emptying and inhibition of the transit of non-absorbable markers through the small intestine and, in isolated strips of ileal tissue, inhibition of evoked acetylcholine release, peristalsis, and cholinergic and non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) contractions of longitudinal or circular smooth muscle. These are contractions evoked electrically or by agents that are thought to stimulate contractile transmitter release either in tissue taken from morphine pretreated animals (naloxone) or in unpretreated tissue (gamma-aminobutyric acid and 5-hydroxytryptamine). The inhibitory effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on gastric emptying and intestinal transit are mediated to some extent by CB1 receptors in the brain as well as by enteric CB1 receptors. Gastric acid secretion is also inhibited in response to CB1 receptor activation, although the detailed underlying mechanism has yet to be elucidated. Cannabinoid receptor agonists delay gastric emptying in humans as well as in rodents and probably also inhibit human gastric acid secretion. Cannabinoid pretreatment induces tolerance to the inhibitory effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on gastrointestinal motility. Findings that the CB1 selective antagonist/inverse agonist SR141716A produces in vivo and in vitro signs of increased motility of rodent small intestine probably reflect the presence in the enteric nervous system of a population of CB1 receptors that are precoupled to their effector mechanisms. SR141716A has been reported not to behave in this manner in the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation (MPLM) of human ileum unless this has first been rendered cannabinoid tolerant. Nor has it been found to induce "withdrawal" contractions in cannabinoid tolerant guinea pig ileal MPLM. Further research is required to investigate the role both of endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists and of non-CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. The extent to which the effects on gastrointestinal function of cannabinoid receptor agonists or antagonists/inverse agonists can be exploited therapeutically has yet to be investigated as has the extent to which these drugs can provoke unwanted effects in the gastrointestinal tract when used for other therapeutic purposes.

source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11358910?dopt=Abstract
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 

Cannabinoids and intestinal motility: welcome to CB2 receptors

Angelo A Izzo1

1Department of Experimental Pharmacology, University of Naples Federico II, via D Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy

Correspondence: Angelo A. Izzo, Department of Experimental Pharmacology, University of Naples Federico II, via D Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy. E-mail: aaizzo@unina.it

Received 16 April 2004; Accepted 21 May 2004; Published online 26 July 2004.
Top of page
Abstract

Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (the active ingredient of marijuana), as well as endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids, exert many biological functions by activating two types of cannabinoid receptors, CB1 receptors (expressed by central and peripheral neurons) and CB2 receptors (that occur mainly in immune cells). Convincing evidence has accumulated in recent years that cannabinoids inhibit gastric and intestinal motility through activation of enteric CB1 receptors. However, a report in this issue of British Journal of Pharmacology has highlighted the possibility that CB2 receptors in the rat intestine could contribute to reducing the increase of intestinal motility induced by an endotoxic inflammation. By minimizing the adverse psychotropic effects associated with brain cannabinoid receptors, the CB2 receptor represents a new molecular target for the treatment of motility disorders associated with intestinal inflammation.
Keywords:

Cannabinoid receptors, cyclooxygenase, inflammation, intestine, intestinal motility, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
Abbreviations:

2-AG, 2-arachidonylglycerol; Delta9-THC, tetrahydrocannabinol; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NOS, nitric oxide synthase

Botanical preparations of Cannabis sativa (Indian hemp) have been widely used in the past to treat a variety of disorders including those affecting the digestive tract. In 1964, Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC) was isolated, and was later shown to be responsible for many of the pharmacological actions of Cannabis preparations. The understanding of the mechanism by which marijuana exerts its pharmacological actions has seen considerable progress following the discovery in the early 1990s of specific membrane, G-protein-coupled receptors for Delta9-THC, namely CB1 receptors, expressed by central and peripheral nerves (including the enteric nervous system), and CB2 receptors, which occur mainly in immune cells. The discovery of these receptors has led to the demonstration that there are endogenous agonists for these receptors. The best known are anandamide, 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG) (nonselective cannabinoid receptor agonists), noladin ether (CB1 receptor agonist) and virodhamine (CB1 receptor antagonist/CB2 receptor agonist). When released, anandamide and 2-AG are removed from extracellular compartments by a carrier-mediated reuptake process, and once within the cell, both endocannabinoids are hydrolyzed by the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (also named anandamide amidohydrolase). In addition to the two cannabinoid receptors, anandamide and 2-AG (both detected in the gut) can also activate vanilloid receptors, the molecular target for the pungent plant compound capsaicin (for a review, see De Petrocellis et al., 2004).

Several recent, independent investigations provide compelling evidence that cannabinoids reduce gastrointestinal motility through activation of enteric CB1 receptors. Cannabinoid receptor agonists affect motility of isolated intestinal segments in a manner that resembles the neuromodulatory response to prejunctional mu-opioid receptor or alpha2-adrenoceptor activation of cholinergic, postganglionic parasympathetic neurones. Thus, a number of cannabinoid receptor agonists (via CB1 activation) have been shown to reduce or inhibit excitatory transmission, neural acetylcholine release and peristalsis efficiency in isolated intestinal segments. A functional evidence for the presence of prejunctional CB1 in the human isolated ileum and colon, through which the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 inhibited electrically evoked contractile responses, has also been demonstrated. Consistent with these in vitro studies, cannabinoid receptor agonists reduce gastric, small intestinal and colonic motility in rodents in vivo, an effect counteracted by the selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A, but not by the selective CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528. Interestingly, a CB1-mediated reduction of intestinal motility has been observed also in some pathophysiological states in mice, including the experimental ileus induced by intraperitoneal administration of acetic acid and the model of intestinal inflammation induced by oral croton oil (for a review, see Di Carlo & Izzo, 2003).

In this issue of the British Journal of Pharmacology, Mathison et al. (2004) provide pharmacological evidence that the CB1-mediated reduction of gastrointestinal transit was absent in rats treated with an endotoxic inflammatory agent, being replaced by a CB2-mediated inhibition of stimulated transit. It is reported that the selective CB2 receptor agonist JWH-133 was without effect in control animals, but it reduced the increase in gastrointestinal transit induced by intraperitoneal administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The effect of JWH-133 was dose dependent and it was prevented by the selective CB2 receptor antagonist AM-630. Perhaps surprisingly, the selective CB1 receptor agonist ACEA inhibited motility in control rats but it was without effect in mice treated with LPS. The authors hypothesised that the lack of effect of CB1 receptor on LPS-stimulated gastrointestinal transit might reflect an inactivation of this receptor by this inflammatory stimulus. It is very unlikely that CB2 receptors are tonically activated by endogenous cannabinoids in this model of intestinal inflammation, since the CB2 antagonist alone was without effect in the LPS-induced increase in transit. Notably, it has been recently reported that endogenous cannabinoid anandamide exerts a protective role on cholera toxin-induced fluid accumulation via activation of overexpressed CB1 receptors on enteric cholinergic nerves (Izzo et al., 2003).
To examine the role of putative mediators that might be involved in the inhibition of LPS-stimulated increase in gastrointestinal transit by CB2 receptors, the authors evaluated a number of antagonists/inhibitors in the absence and presence of the CB2 receptor agonist JWH-133. Based on these experiments, it was convincingly demonstrated that the CB2 agonist acted via cyclooxygenase metabolites and independently of inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and platelet-activating factor (PAF). Indeed, indomethacin completely abrogated the inhibitory effect of JWH-133, while the PAF receptor antagonist PCA 4248 or the inducible NOS inhibitor SATU did not modify JWH-133-induced motility changes. Preliminary evidence for the possible involvement of interleukin-1beta or endothelial NOS was also provided. Based upon these results and the literature, it is hypothesized that cannabinoids act on CB2 receptors expressed by inflammatory/immune and/or epithelial cells to inhibit the release of inflammatory mediators, which are known to stimulate intestinal peristalsis. Consistent with this scenario, Ihenetu and colleagues have recently reported that TNF-alpha-induced interleukin-8 release was inhibited by cannabinoids through activation of CB2 receptors in human colonic epithelial cells, which are recognised to exert a major influence in the maintenance of intestinal immune homeostasis (Ihenetu et al., 2003).

The potential therapeutic value of such findings seems to be relevant. Activation of CB2 receptors represents a novel mechanism for the re-establishment of normal gastrointestinal transit after an inflammatory stimulus. The strategy to use selective CB2 receptor agonists for the treatment of hypermotility during inflammatory bowel diseases is highly promising because it is likely to be devoid of the well-known Cannabis unwanted effects (e.g. Sedation, cognitive dysfunction, ataxia and psychotropic effects), which are due to activation of brain CB1 receptors. Also, it will be interesting to see in future studies whether a CB2 mechanism exists to protect the gut from the fluid hypersecretion and mucosal damage associated to endotoxic inflammation. Clearly, further exploration of the role of CB2 receptors in the gut is likely to produce worthwhile results.
Top of page
References

1. DE PETROCELLIS L., CASCIO M.G. & DI MARZO V. (2004) The endocannabinoid system: a general view and latest additions. Br. J. Pharmacol. 141: 765−774. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
2. DI CARLO G. & IZZO A.A. (2003) Cannabinoids for gastrointestinal diseases: potential therapeutic applications. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 12: 39−49. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
3. IHENETU K., MOLLEMAN A., PARSONS M.E. & WHELAN C.J. (2003) Inhibition of interleukin-8 release in the human colonic epithelial cell line HT-29 by cannabinoids. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 458: 207−215. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
4. IZZO A.A., CAPASSO F., COSTAGLIOLA A., BISOGNO T., MARSICANO G., LIGRESTI A., MATIAS I., CAPASSO R., PINTO L., BORRELLI F., CECIO A., LUTZ B., MASCOLO N. & DI MARZO V. (2003) An endogenous cannabinoid tone attenuates cholera toxin-induced fluid accumulation in mice. Gastroenterology 125: 765−774. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
5. MATHISON R., HO W., PITTMAN Q.J.M., DAVISON J.S. & SHARKEY K.A. (2004) Effects of cannabinoid receptor-2 activation on accelerated gastrointestinal transit in lipopolysaccharide-treated rats. Br J. Pharmacol. 142: 1247−1254. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

More links,,,,


*Cannabis-based drugs could offer new hope for inflammatory bowel disease patients
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/28584.php

*Cannabis may soothe inflamed bowels
http://www.chanvre-info.ch/info/en/C...-inflamed.html

*In the Human Colon: Cannabinoids Promote Epithelial Wound Healing
http://www.gastrojournal.org/article...09297/abstract

*Crohn's Patients Report Symptomatic Relief From Cannabis
http://www.thehempire.com/index.php/cannabis/news/4650

*Cannabis Helps Ulcers And Crohn's Disease
http://www.thehempire.com/index.php/...crohns_disease

*Bowel Study Backs Cannabis Drugs
http://www.thehempire.com/index.php/...cannabis_drugs

*Cannabis use by patients with inflammatory bowel disease
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...dcc522e0951943

*Endocannabinoids and the gastrointestinal tract: what are the key questions?
http://www.nature.com/bjp/journal/v1.....;/0707422a.html

*MARIJUANA AND IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME (IBS) (anecdotal)
http://www.rxmarihuana.com/christine.htm

*Marijuana and Crohn’s Disease (anecdotal)
http://www.rxmarihuana.com/chrohns3.htm


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mayo Study: Marijuana's THC Reduces Stomach Cramping
http://bbsnews.net/article.php/20061029211046523

Anti-inflammatory compound from cannabis found in herbs
http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Ne...e/24060801.asp

Cannabidiol, extracted from Cannabis sativa, selectively inhibits inflammatory hypermotility in mice.
http://marijuana.researchtoday.net/archive/5/6/1797.htm
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
NEUROREGULATION AND MOTILITY

Distribution and function of monoacylglycerol lipase in the gastrointestinal tract
Marnie Duncan,1 Adam D. Thomas,1 Nina L. Cluny,1 Annie Patel,2 Kamala D. Patel,1 Beat Lutz,3 Daniele Piomelli,4 Stephen P. H. Alexander,2 and Keith A. Sharkey1
1Hotchkiss Brain Institute and Snyder Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 2School of Biomedical Sciences and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom; 3Department of Physiological Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; and 4Department of Pharmacology, University of California, Irvine, California

Submitted 18 August 2008 ; accepted in final form 17 October 2008


The endogenous cannabinoid system plays an important role in the regulation of gastrointestinal function in health and disease. Endocannabinoid levels are regulated by catabolic enzymes. Here, we describe the presence and localization of monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL), the major enzyme responsible for the degradation of 2-arachidonoylglycerol. We used molecular, biochemical, immunohistochemical, and functional assays to characterize the distribution and activity of MGL. MGL mRNA was present in rat ileum throughout the wall of the gut. MGL protein was distributed in the muscle and mucosal layers of the ileum and in the duodenum, proximal colon, and distal colon. We observed MGL expression in nerve cell bodies and nerve fibers of the enteric nervous system. There was extensive colocalization of MGL with PGP 9.5 and calretinin-immunoreactive neurons, but not with nitric oxide synthase. MGL was also present in the epithelium and was highly expressed in the small intestine. Enzyme activity levels were highest in the duodenum and decreased along the gut with lowest levels in the distal colon. We observed both soluble and membrane-associated enzyme activities. The MGL inhibitor URB602 significantly inhibited whole gut transit in mice, an action that was abolished in cannabinoid 1 receptor-deficient mice. In conclusion, MGL is localized in the enteric nervous system where endocannabinoids regulate intestinal motility. MGL is highly expressed in the epithelium, where this enzyme may have digestive or other functions yet to be determined.


endocannabinoids; enteric nervous system; URB602; 2-arachidonoyl glycerol

source: http://ajpgi.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/295/6/G1255
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Mayo Study: Marijuana's THC Reduces Stomach Cramping
Sunday, October 29 2006 @ 09:10 PM EST
Edited by: Michael Hess

Science: THC reduces stomach cramping after eating according to a clinical study by the Mayo Clinic

IACM via BBSNews 2006-10-29 -- THC may relax the colon and reduce stomach cramping after eating, according to a study presented at the 71st Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology. The study compared the effects of dronabinol (THC) and placebo on colonic motility and sensation in healthy adults.


Doctors at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, USA, conducted a double-blind, parallel-group study of 52 volunteers who were randomly assigned placebo or a single dose of dronabinol. The researchers found that THC relaxes the colon and reduces post- eating contractions and cramping. Further, the effects were most pronounced in females. "The potential for cannabinoids to modulate colonic motor function in disease deserves a further look," said study leader Dr. Tuba Esfandyari.
source: http://bbsnews.net/article.php/20061029211046523
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

Cannabis Helps - Crohn's/IBS

Although the use of cannabinoids as antiemetics (anti-nausea) is well-established, with Dronabinol available to stimulate appetite and counter effects of cancer chemotherapy, the effect of cannabinoids on disorders of the gut has not been extensively studied. However the current state of knowledge of the biochemistry of cannabinoids is increasing at an exponential rate and, with discoveries of cannabinoid receptors in unexpected areas of the body, new potential research/treatment avenues are appearing at an increasing rate.

Grinspoon reports anecdotal use of cannabis to control bowel movements in multiple sclerosis, and relief from the symptoms of Crohn’s disease. Mikuriya records irritable bowel syndrome, as well as other inflammatory gastrointestinal conditions (principally among AIDS patients), as one of a wide variety of conditions for which cannabis has been prescribed or recommended for therapeutic use in California.

There are no clinical trials currently published, and consequently use for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome would represent at best an experimental therapy.

However, there does appear to be some scientific support for any claimed therapeutic benefits from the research literature concerning the actions and metabolism of cannabinoids and cannabinoid receptors. The wall of the intestine is composed of a type of muscle known as ‘smooth muscle’, also found lining the walls of arteries and in other involuntary functions.

Rosell et al first demonstrated that cannabinoids inhibit contractions of the small intestine in the rat. Pertwee et al established the presence of cannabinoid (CB1) receptors within the guinea-pig intestine and Kazuhisa et al established the presence of enzymes break down anandamide (the endogenous cannabinoid CB1-agonist) within the small intestine.

The smooth muscle-relaxant properties of cannabinoids are so well established that preparations of guinea-pig intestine are routinely used as an in vitro screening tool to test the potency and function of novel cannabinoids.

Shook & Burks found that THC reduced the frequency of intestinal contractions, and reduced the flow of food in the small intestine, without altering basal tone, and concluded that ‘delta 9-THC, delta 9,11-THC, cannabinol and nabilone (but not cannabidiol) exert an inhibitory effect on GI transit and motility in rats’.

Cadas et al reported that a gut enzyme (vasoactive intestinal peptide) may regulate the precursor chemical to anandamide (which activates cannabinoid CB1 receptors) and N-palmitoylethanolamine (which activates a CB2-like receptor subtype), suggesting that endogenous cannabinoids may play a role in regulating the activity of the gut.

source: http://www.budbuddies.com/cannabishelps/crohns_ibs.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cannabinoids Offer Novel Therapy For GI Disorders


June 15, 2006 - Mainz, Germany

Mainz, Germany: Cannabinoids protect the gastrointestinal (GI) tract from inflammation and abnormally high gastric secretions, and could potentially treat numerous GI-related disorders such as Crohn's disease and irritable bowl syndrome, according to review data published in the Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.

Investigators at Germany's Johannes Gutenberg University report that activation of the body's cannabinoid receptors protect the gastrointestinal tract from inflammation and modulate gastric secretions and intestinal motility. "For such protective activities, the endocannabinoid system may represent a new promising therapeutic target against different GI disorders, including inflammatory bowel diseases, functional bowel diseases, and secretion and motility disorders," they conclude.

Though the use of cannabis to treat symptoms of GI disorders has been reported anecdotally for several decades, virtually no clinical trials on the subject have been conducted. Survey data reported last fall in O'Shaughnessy's: The Journal of Cannabis in Clinical Practice, found that Crohn's patients experienced subjective benefits from cannabis, including pain relief and increased appetite. German investigators at the University Hospital in Munich are now assessing the efficacy of cannabis extracts for the treatment of Crohn's.

Researchers in the United Kingdom also reported last year that cannabinoids promote healing in the gastrointestinal membrane, and may provide therapeutic relief to patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

For more information, please contact Paul Armentano, NORML Senior Policy Analyst, at (202) 483-5500. Full text of the study, "Endocannabinoids and the gastrointestinal tract," appears in the current issue of the Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.

source: http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6931
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Involvement of cannabinoid receptors in gut motility and visceral perception
Pamela J Hornby1* and Stephen M Prouty1
1Enterology Research Team, Box 776, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC, Welsh and McKean Roads, Spring House, PA, 19477-0776, U.S.A.
*Author for correspondence: Email: phornby@prdus.jnj.com
Received February 4, 2004; Revised March 8, 2004; Accepted March 9, 2004.


Abstract
From a historical perspective to the present day, all the evidence suggests that activation of cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) is beneficial for gut discomfort and pain, which are symptoms related to dysmotility and visceral perception. CBRs comprise G-protein coupled receptors that are predominantly in enteric and central neurones (CB1R) and immune cells (CB2R). In the last decade, evidence obtained from the use of selective agonists and inverse agonists/antagonists indicates that manipulation of CB1R can alter (1) sensory processing from the gut, (2) brain integration of brain-gut axis, (3) extrinsic control of the gut and (4) intrinsic control by the enteric nervous system. The extent to which activation of CB1R is most critical at these different levels is related to the region of the GI tract. The upper GI tract is strongly influenced by CB1R activation on central vagal pathways, whereas intestinal peristalsis can be modified by CB1R activation in the absence of extrinsic input. Actions at multiple levels make the CB1R a target for the treatment of functional bowel disorders, such as IBS. Since low-grade inflammation may act as a trigger for occurrence of IBS, CB2R modulation could be beneficial, but there is little supporting evidence for this yet. The challenge is to accomplish CBR activation while minimizing adverse effects and abuse liabilities. Potential therapeutic strategies involve increasing signaling by endocannabinoids (EC). The pathways involved in the biosynthesis, uptake and degradation of EC provide opportunities for modulation of CB1R and some recent evidence with inhibitors of EC uptake and metabolism suggest that these could be exploited for therapeutic gain.



Introduction

A growing body of literature indicates that substances which act on cannabinoid receptors (CBR) alter secretion and motility of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (reviewed in Pinto et al., 2002a; Di Carlo & Izzo, 2003) and have antinociceptive or antihyperalgesic properties (reviewed in Rice et al., 2002). This makes them an attractive target for GI functional disorders, such as Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). In the introduction, we will review the background on the cannabinoids and their receptors, and then we will focus on the GI effects of drugs that interact with the CBR.

The evidence that cannabinoids exert beneficial effects on the GI tract has a long history. Reportedly, the Greek doctor Galen used marijuana to treat pain and flatulence, and its first reported use as an antiemetic is by Li Shih-Chen in 1578 (Earleywine, 2002). In the 1840s in India, where marijuana was a commonly used remedy, O'Shaughnessy reported his observations that, although it did not cure disorders, it eased the pain and nausea associated with them (O'Shaughnessy, 1842). By the early 1900s Squibb Company offered a mixture of cannabis and morphine (Chlorodyne) for stomach problems (Roffman, 1982), and other companies followed suit. However, subsequent restrictions on the use of cannabis, culminating in prohibition in the United States, dampened research and medicinal interest in cannabis in the first half of the 20th century.

Cannabis contains 66 cannabinoids of which delta9-tetrahydrocannibol (delta9-THC) and delta8-THC appear to account for the majority of effects. Cannabis also contains high amounts of a nonpsychoactive constituent cannabidiol. In the 1960s and 1970s a majority of studies described the effects of delta9-THC in experimental models. Several pharmaceutical companies developed cannabinoid analogues that went into clinical trials. This led to two marketed products, Nabilone, a chemical derivative of delta9-THC (developed by Eli Lilly and Company but only available in the U.K.), and dronabinol (Marinol), a synthetic delta9-THC (approved by the FDA in 1985 for cancer patients and in 1992 for AIDS patients). In 1999, the United States Drug Enforcement Agency reduced dronabinol's classification from schedule II to III. Marijuana is classified as Schedule I and its medicinal use is prohibited at the federal level, although an increasing number of states have passed referendums that allow its use ingested or inhaled. The relatively better apparent effect of smoked marijuana for its orexigenic and antiemetic effects than dronabinol are presumably due to better absorption and rapid onset of effect, which enables the effective dose to be more easily titrated.

Delta9-THC inhibits adenylyl cyclase and reduces cellular cAMP levels, which identified its receptor as a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). Sequence similarity to known GPCRs lead to cloning of CB1R (Matsuda et al., 1990), and soon after the CB2R (Munro et al., 1993). The CB1R has been localized in neural tissue throughout the body and described most thoroughly in central (Tsou et al., 1998; Fride, 2002) and enteric (Kulkarni-Narla & Brown, 2000; Coutts et al., 2002; MacNaughton et al., 2004) neurons. The CB2R is primarily expressed in the immune system (reviewed in Parolaro et al., 2002). Both receptors are G protein coupled via Gi/o. CB1R is highly conserved in rodent and human (Gerard et al., 1991) and found in a wide variety of species. This conservation is somewhat unusual among GPCRs, and has enabled much progress in the understanding of the site and potential roles of CBR in physiological and pathophysiological systems relevant for human.

The identification of the first reported endogenous ligand was a fatty acid amide, arachidonoylethanolamide (AEA), also termed, anandamide (Devane et al., 1992). Subsequently, a number of related endocannabinoids (EC) that bind to CBRs have been identified. The monoglyceride, 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (2-AG) is even more abundant in brain tissue than AEA, and may be more potent at CB2R than AEA (Mechoulam et al., 1995; Sugiura et al., 2000). Both AEA and 2-AG are present in the mouse small intestine, with 2-AG being approximately 1000-fold higher than AEA (Izzo et al., 2001; Pinto et al., 2002a). The fact that 2-AG acts at CB2R on immune cells (Parolaro et al., 2002) has implications for inflammatory-related GI diseases, such as postinfectious IBS, but there are no data to demonstrate potential therapeutic benefits of this at present.

Another ether-type EC, 2-arachidonyl glyceryl ether (noladin ether) has also been identified in the porcine brain (Hanus et al., 2001), but negligible levels were found in the rat brain by using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis and fluorometric high-performance liquid chromatography analysis (Oka et al., 2003). cis-9-Octadecenoamide (oleamide) has been recently proposed to be a selective endogenous agonist for CB1R (Leggett et al., 2004). Palmitoylethanolamide is another proposed EC, but it does not bind to CBR (Sugiura et al., 2000). Finally, virodhamine has been identified as a CB1R partial agonist in vitro, with antagonist activity in vivo, and as a full agonist activity of CB2R (Porter et al., 2002). Virodhamine is arachidonic acid and ethanolamine joined by an ester linkage, and although the initial results are intriguing, more studies are needed to determine the role of this novel EC.


GI effects of cannabinoids

Characterization of the effects of CBR stimulation comes from administration of selective agonists, such as analogs of delta9-THC, and inverse agonists/antagonists. Since there have been several reviews on this subject in the last couple of years, we have focused on the most recent data and organized the known effects of cannabinoids on different regions of the upper to lower GI tract. In the subsequent section, we have reviewed the evidence for the potential sites of action of CBRs mediating these effects.

Upper GI tract and CBR
Early studies showed that delta9-THC slowed the rate of gastric emptying and small intestinal transit in mice and in rats (Shook & Burks, 1989). The ability of cannabinoids to decrease motor activity in the stomach (Krowicki et al., 1999) and decrease gastric emptying (Izzo et al., 1999a) were confirmed. In both studies, the effects were reversible by the selective CB1R antagonist, N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-l-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazole-carboxamide (SR141716A or rimonibant, Sanofi Recherche) indicating that the effects were mediated via CB1R. Similar findings have also been reported in healthy volunteers given delta9-THC, confirming that the drug delays gastric emptying of a radiolabeled solid food (McCallum et al., 1999). Delta9-THC also decreased intragastric pressure in rats (Krowicki et al., 1999) and, by using a miniaturized rigid cylinder barostat, it was shown that this resulted in an increase in intragastric volume (Ball et al., 2001). Whether these effects could be beneficial in patients with functional dyspepsia that have impaired fundic relaxation is unknown. However, since basal gastric tone and compliance is related in some way to nausea and feeling of fullness, these effects could contribute to the antiemetic and orexigenic effects of delta9-THC. In this regard is somewhat puzzling that CB1R activation delays gastric emptying (Izzo et al., 1999a; Krowicki et al., 1999) since this can be associated with nauseogenic stimuli. The dissociation of delayed gastric emptying and gastric stasis from the sensation of nausea may be an example of the way in which CB1R can alter visceral perception. Certainly, antinausea and antiemetic effects of cannabinoids have been well characterized.

The antiemetic effect of delta9-THC and related compounds has been confirmed clinically (Tramer et al., 2001). In animal studies, activation of CBR1 has dose-related antiemetic effects in experimental models of emesis (Darmani, 2001; Simoneau et al., 2001; Van Sickle et al., 2001; 2003; Darmani et al., 2003b; Parker et al., 2004). In non-humans, nausea is hard to measure, however, conditioned rejection reactions in rats may reflect a sensation of nausea (Parker & Kemp, 2001). Delta9-THC and CB1R agonists interfere with nausea elicited by lithium chloride and with conditioned nausea elicited by a flavor paired with lithium chloride (Parker et al., 2002; 2003). The same group also present evidence that CB1R activation may be effective to prevent an animal model of anticipatory nausea and vomiting. In Suncus murinus (musk shrew) the investigators paired a novel contextual cue with an emetogenic injection of lithium chloride. After training, the context alone could elicit retching in the absence of the toxin. This conditioned response was completely suppressed by pretreatment with delta9-THC, at a dose that did not suppress general activity (Parker & Kemp, 2001). A more detailed discussion of the site of action for the antiemetic effects of cannabinoids is discussed later, but multiple lines of evidence suggest that it is on CB1R vagal pathways both centrally and peripherally (see below).

Activation of CBRs also has effects on the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) that may be beneficial in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Although the majority of GORD patients are well controlled by antacids, proton pump inhibitors, and histamine2 receptor antagonists, there remains a population of less well-defined patients who do not respond to these treatments and have symptoms of pain and discomfort associated with reflux. It is now generally accepted that neural control of LOS pressure may provide a different mechanism for reducing acid reflux. Specifically, LOS tone is generally maintained except during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs), swallowing, and prior to emesis. TLOSRs are defined as rapid, sustained reductions in pressure, which are not associated with a swallow (Holloway & Dent, 1990). They increase in frequency after a meal, are associated with reflux events, and may promote the development of GORD (Holloway & Dent, 1990). Therefore, reducing the incidence of TLOSRs could remove an underlying cause of reflux, and several substances (e.g. GABAB receptor agonist, baclofen) have been shown to be effective to prevent TLOSRs in human (Lidums et al., 2000).

The CBR agonist, WIN 55,212-2, attenuated TLOSRs evoked by gastric distention in conscious dogs (Lehmann et al., 2002). Specifically, WIN 55,212-2 reduced by 80% the incidence of TLOSRs and increased the latency of the first TLOSR, as well as reduced swallowing (Lehmann et al., 2002). Both drugs also reduced gastric distention-evoked LOS relaxation in decerebrate and unanesthetized ferrets (Partosoedarso et al., 2003b). These effects are via CBIR activation in both of these studies since they were prevented by the selective CB1R antagonist, rimonibant. The site of action for CB1R to inhibit TLOSRs is via modulation of vagal pathways at peripheral and central levels (see below). However, despite the encouraging preclinical data, it is unknown whether CBRs mediate the same effect in humans. In addition, it unclear the extent to which reduction of TLOSRs alone would be effective in GORD patients. This is partly because inhibition of TLOSRs is not always associated with reduced acid exposure in the oesophagus, for example, Zhang et al. (2002). A two pronged approach – to inhibit TLOSRs and reduce gastric acid secretion could potentially be more effective.

The experimental data in animals suggests that CB1R activation also decreases gastric acid secretion. In anesthetized rats, although CB1R activation does not alter unstimulated basal (low level) secretion (Coruzzi et al., 1999), it attenuates gastric acid secretion induced by both pentagastrin and 2-deoxy-D-glucose (Adami et al., 2002). In contrast, CB1R agonists have no effect on histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion (Adami et al., 2002). Because pentagastrin and 2-deoxyglucose both stimulate vagally mediated acid secretion, these data implicate CB1R on vagal efferent control of parietal cell secretion, rather than directly on parietal cells. However, it also should be noted that since the receptor is present on enterochromaffin-like cells in the stomach, activation of CB1R could also reduce endogenous histamine release and thereby reduce acid secretion (Adami et al., 2002). CB2R-immunoreactivity was not visualized in the rat stomach by using a human CB2R antibody (Adami et al., 2002) and activation of CB2R selectively did not attenuate basal or stimulated gastric acid secretion (Coruzzi et al., 1999; Adami et al., 2002). WIN 55,212-2 acting on CB1R also reduces gastric ulceration in cold-restraint stress paradigm (Germano et al., 2001), but the site of action of this effect is not yet known. Consistent with the experimental studies, an early study showed that human volunteers who smoked cannabis more than twice a week had low gastric acid output (Nalin et al., 1978).

In summary, experimental animal data support the notion that CB1R activation both reduces TLOSRs and gastric acid output. However, to our knowledge, it is not known whether delta9-THC or its analogues are effective in humans to reduce TLOSRs and gastric acid secretion or what their potential therapeutic utility may be in GORD patients.

Lower GI tract and CBR
Low-frequency electrical field stimulation (EFS) results in contraction of muscle in a longitudinal muscle-myenteric plexus-preparation of the guinea-pig small intestine due to acetylcholine (ACh) release (Pertwee et al., 1996; Coutts & Pertwee, 1997). CBR agonists inhibit the EFS-evoked response in a rimonibant reversible manner, but have no effect on responses to exogenous Ach. These data indicate a presynaptic site of action of CB1R to reduce excitatory (cholinergic) neurotransmission to the smooth muscle (Pertwee et al., 1996; Coutts & Pertwee, 1997; Pertwee, 2001). Indeed, myogenic contractions of the guinea pig ileum induced by indomethacin are not inhibited by CBR agonists, suggesting that there are minimal effects directly on smooth muscle (Heinemann et al., 1999). Similar to the situation in guinea-pig, WIN 55,212-2 prevented contractions elicited by EFS in human ileum (and colon), but not carbachol (Manara et al., 2002), suggesting that functional receptors are present in human.

CB1R are involved in regulation of small intestinal water and electrolyte transport. In guinea-pig (MacNaughton et al., 2004) and rat (Tyler et al., 2000) ileum, WIN 55,212-2 reduces the EFS-evoked increases in short-circuit current (Isc), which is an indicator of net electrogenic ion transport. Both studies showed that the effect of the agonist to inhibit neurogenically mediated increases in Isc was reversible by rimonibant. CB1R are visualized on both noncholinergic (VIP) and cholinergic (NPY +ve) submucosal secretomotor neurones (MacNaughton et al., 2004). It should be noted that, in contrast to this study, VIP neurons did not contain CB1R in the pig (Kulkarni-Narla & Brown, 2000).

Capsaicin can be used to activate extrinsic primary afferents resulting in an increase in Isc (MacNaughton et al., 2004). CB1R activation inhibits the responses to capsaicin (by just under 50%) and EFS (by about 30%). WIN 55,212-2 did not alter Isc responses to forskolin or carbachol (MacNaughton et al., 2004). Therefore, these studies clearly indicate that the agonists act on nerves rather than directly on the epithelium to attenuate stimulated ion transport. They further present evidence that suggests that CB1R on extrinsic nerves may be important for this response (see below).

Increased accumulation of fluid in the ex vivo small intestine in response to cholera toxin is significantly reduced by administration of CB1R agonists, in an rimonibant reversible manner (Izzo et al., 2003). In an in vivo model of diarrhea, oral administration of croton oil induces diarrhea and increased GI transit, which are inhibited in a dose-related fashion by WIN55,212-2 and cannabinol (Izzo et al., 2000). Furthermore, croton oil administration induced levels of inflammation that were correlated with increased CB1R expression, and CBR agonists more effectively decreased intestinal motility in inflamed than in control animals (Izzo et al., 2001). This evidence points to a protective role of CB1R in inflammation-mediated motility changes. Other models also demonstrate efficacy of CB1R activation to reduce diarrhea. An early study showed that delta9-THC (5–10 mg kg) reduces diarrhea associated with naloxone-precipitated withdrawal from morphine in rats (Hine et al., 1975). Additionally, blockade of endogenous EC with rimonibant precipitates diarrhea in morphine-dependent rats (Navarro et al., 1998). However, a low oral dose of 20 mg−1 kg delta9-THC in mice was not able to reduce diarrhea precipitated by naloxone in morphine-tolerant animals, although other aspects of withdrawal could be attenuated (Cichewicz & Welch, 2003). Therefore, this effect was only evident at doses that were associated with other CNS effects. Despite these data, the overall effect of CB1R activation on secretion and absorption in humans is not established. In one early study, it was noted that human volunteers who smoked cannabis developed more copious diarrhea when exposed to Vibrio cholerae (Nalin et al., 1978); however, no clinical studies using orally administered CB1R agonists are available to our knowledge.

Peristalsis can be initiated by radial extension of the intestines and results in oral ascending excitatory and descending inhibitory activity in the intrinsic myenteric nerves. Methanandamide inhibited both the cholinergic component of the ascending excitatory reflex, as well as the hexamethonium-resistant portion, which is thought to be due to tachykinin release (Heinemann et al., 1999). Since the ascending reflex initiates peristalsis, the effect of CBR would be to raise the threshold for peristalsis and reduce propulsive activity.

The antipropulsive effects of CB1R should reduce transit time in the large intestine, and this appears to be the case. Delta9-THC reduces fecal pellet output in open field behavior of rats, and this was prevented by rimonibant, suggesting that stress-evoked changes in transit can be reversed by CB1R activation (Jarbe et al., 1998). In the mouse colon, the expression of CB1R in myenteric neurones combined with functional data in myenteric neurone/smooth muscle preparation indicate that CB1R are expressed in cholinergic neurones (Storr et al., 2004). For example, CB1R agonists reduced the excitatory junctional potential evoked by focal stimulation and consistent with this, the evoked response is significantly higher in CB1R-deficient mice than in wild-type littermate controls (Storr et al., 2004). Consistent with this, rimonibant increased excitatory junctional potentials in wild type but not in CB1R-deficient mice. Interestingly, CB1R is not visualized in nitrergic myenteric neurones (Storr et al., 2004) which include descending inhibitory motor neurons. These investigators confirmed that in mouse colon the CB1R is colocalized in a subpopulation of choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive neurones and fiber bundles in the myenteric plexus. In mouse colon, CB1R agonists slowed the expulsion of a glass bead inserted into the distal colon, whereas rimonibant alone increased motility (Pinto et al., 2002b). All these data suggest that CB1R inhibits excitatory cholinergic neurotransmission in mouse colon similar to other rodents.

There are no studies in human volunteers on the colonic effects of CB1R activation; however, in one study AEA did not modify the relaxant effect of capsaicin on mucosa-free circular strips of the human sigmoid colon in vitro (Bartho et al., 2002).


CBR sites of action mediating GI effects of cannabinoids

What is clear from the experimental data is that CB1R agonists act at multiple sites to mediate their GI effects. Most of the evidence points to the central vagal site of action of cannabinoids to modulate vomiting (Van Sickle et al., 2001; Darmani et al., 2003b; Van Sickle et al., 2003) gastric motility (Krowicki et al., 1999), gastric volume/pressure (Ball et al., 2001), lower esophageal sphincter pressure (Partosoedarso et al., 2003b) and gastric acid secretion. In the hindbrain medulla, CB1R immunoreactivity is visualized with varying intensity within the area postrema, subnuclei of the nucleus tractus solitarius and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nuclei (Figure 1), which altogether form the dorsal vagal complex (Van Sickle et al., 2001; 2003; Partosoedarso et al., 2003b). Clear evidence of the central vagal site of action comes from experiments where local application of CB1R agonists to the surface of the medulla above the dorsal vagal complex mimicked the antiemetic (Van Sickle et al., 2003) and LOS (Partosoedarso et al., 2003b) effects of i.v. delta9-THC, at a dose 100-fold lower than the lowest effective intravenous dose. Maybe this is not surprising that CB1R activation inhibits emesis centrally, since both LOS relaxation and emesis are part of central motor pattern generation involving the dorsal vagal complex and other nuclei in the hindbrain (reviewed in Hornby, 2001; Hornby et al., 2002). Functional activation of emetic neuronal pathways induced by cisplatin results in Fos expression in the area postrema, dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, and the medial and dorsal subnuclei of the nucleus tractus solitarius (Van Sickle et al., 2003). In all these regions, Fos expression was significantly reduced by delta9-THC (Van Sickle et al., 2003). Within the nucleus tractus solitarius, cannabinoids may act on the central terminals of vagal primary afferents or on interneurones synapsing with vagal motor neurones. In the CNS it is well known that ECs are released from the nerve terminal and presynaptically inhibit the release of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters (reviewed in Freund et al., 2003). In the dorsal vagal complex both GABAergic and glutamatergic input to vagal motor neurones are present (Travagli et al., 1991). Preliminary data in whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from a hindbrain slice preparation showed that CB1R agonists inhibited spontaneous and evoked excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic currents in vagal motor neurones (Derbenev et al., 2002; Derbenev & Smith, 2003). These effects were sensitive to synaptic transmission blockade by tetrodotoxin, which suggests that CB1R agonists reduce the synaptic activity during transfer of information from the nucleus tractus solitarius to the vagal motor neurones.
Figure 1 Figure 1
Photomicrograph of CB1R-immunostaining in the ferret hindbrain dorsal vagal complex. Intense staining in cell bodies is noted in the area postrema (AP) and within the medial nucleus tractus solatarius (mNTS). Punctate terminal field like staining is intense (more ...)

Cannabinoids could also act at the peripheral terminals of vagal afferents to alter visceral perception. CB1R is highly expressed in the nodose ganglion (the location of vagal sensory cell bodies (Partosoedarso et al., 2003b) and denervation of c-fiber afferents by perivagal capsaicin treatment abolished the increase in gastric volume evoked by i.v. delta9-THC (Ball et al., 2001). Consistent with this site of action, delta9-THC also inhibited the cisplatin-induced emesis (Van Sickle et al., 2003), and cisplatin induces an early emesis via serotonin release from gut enterochromaffin cells that acts on vagal afferents. Interestingly, CB1R and cholecystokinin1 receptors are co-expressed within vagal afferents that project to the stomach and duodenum, and the data suggest that these interact to modulate food intake and satiety (Burdyga et al., 2004). In this regard it is perplexing that, in a relatively small number of fibers tested, WIN 55,212-2 did not alter firing of gastric vagal mechanoreceptors in response to gastric distention (Lehmann et al., 2002).

Although the above evidence strongly supports a primary site of action of CB1R in the brain to mediate upper GI effects, CB1R immunoreactivity is also present in choline acetyltransferase-positive neurones innervating the gastric muscle and mucosa (Adami et al., 2002; Casu et al., 2003). The role of CB1R at these peripheral gastric sites has not been established yet since vagotomy prevents the antisecretory effect of CB1R on acid release stimulated by pentagastrin and 2-deoxy D-glucose (Adami et al., 2002). Although preliminary data suggest that intracerebroventricular administration of CBR agonists, HU210 and WIN55,212-2, did not attenuate pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion (Adami et al., 2001), this has not been confirmed after administration directly to the dorsal vagal complex, where the agonists would be expected to be effective. Further studies on the site of action for the gastric antisecretory effects on CB1R agonists are needed.

Upper GI transit is increased within 3 h after administration of croton oil. The GI transit effects of croton oil were assessed after intraperitoneal and intracerebroventricular administration of CB1R agonists, in an attempt to ascertain their most likely site of action (Izzo et al., 2000). In these mice, the ED50 values for WIN55,212-2 for inhibition of upper GI transit were lower for intracerebroventricular compared to intraperitoneal administration. In addition, the GI transit effects of WIN55,212-2 given centrally were reversed by hexamethonium (given i.p.). However, a 10-fold higher dose of the CB1R agonist, given intraperitoneally, resulted in reduced GI transit that was not altered by hexamethonium. This suggests that at higher doses there may be direct effects of CB1R activation on nonextrinsic nerves controlling the upper GI tract, that is, on the enteric nervous system. The overall data are consistent with the central site of action of cannabinoids being critical for regulation of upper GI transit, at least when the doses of exogenous agonist are low.

Whereas for the upper GI tract, the CNS is the primary site for many of the motility affects of CB1R agonists, the picture is somewhat less clear for the intestines. Colocalization studies of CB1R and neurotransmitters in the guinea-pig and rat enteric neurones showed that CB1R is expressed on cholinergic sensory, interneuronal, and motor neurones in myenteric ganglia (Coutts et al., 2002). Indeed, the majority of choline acetyltransferase-positive neurones expressed CB1R and myenteric neurones responded to cannabinoids in the presence of hexamethonium suggesting that functional CB1R exist on excitatory intrinsic motoneurones (Coutts et al., 2002). CB1R is also present within intrinsic neurons in the submucosal plexus of the ileum, and is colocalized with vanilloid receptors are paravascular nerves and fibers suggesting that there is also an extrinsic source of CB1R (MacNaughton et al., 2004). It is interesting that vanilloid receptors and CB1R are colocalized because vanilloid receptors are expressed in extrinsic primary afferents and it has been suggested that vanilloid receptors functions as a cannabinoid-gated channel in the CNS (Roberts et al., 2004). The extrinsic source of CB1R was confirmed to be on the peripheral terminals of primary afferents to the submucosal plexus because when the segments of ileum were extrinsically denervated the inhibitory effect of WIN 55,212-2 on EFS evoked Isc was abolished (MacNaughton et al., 2004). It is been demonstrated that CB1R are synthesized in cells of the dorsal root ganglia and inserted on terminals in the periphery (Hohmann & Herkenham, 1999), which could account for the presence of CB1R in submucosal extrinsic afferents. These data collectively show that an important site of action for CB1R agonists to reduce Isc is via the extrinsic primary afferents that act on cholinergic secretomotor pathways. Therefore, CB1R in extrinsic afferents may be important for controlling water balance in the intestines. The role of CB1R localized in intrinsic submucosal neurons (Izzo et al., 2003; Kulkarni-Narla & Brown, 2000) remains to be clarified. However, CB1R may have pivotal actions on intrinsic submucosal secretomotor neurons in pathophysiological states; for example, CB1R agonists inhibit cholera toxin induced fluid accumulation in mice after ganglionic blockade with chlorisondamine (Izzo et al., 2003).

Cannabinoids can also mediate their effects directly by acting on the intrinsic neurones in the absence of extrinsic input. For example, in the isolated mouse distal colon, WIN 55,212-2 attenuated peristaltic activity and decreased contractile activity and volume of fluid ejected during peristalsis (Mancinelli et al., 2001). Rimonibant alone enhanced both tonic and phasic motor activities in the colonic longitudinal smooth muscle (Mancinelli et al., 2001). However, an interesting observation was made in vivo that delta9-THC produced relatively less inhibition of large bowel transit than gastric emptying and small intestinal transit (Shook & Burks, 1989). If one assumes that the vagal modulation of the lower GI tract by the CNS is relatively less than the upper GI tract then the implication is that although CB1R activation can inhibit peristalsis on isolated intestine, overall the effects on the GI tract are more profound when the receptor is acting centrally. However, it is not clear how this situation may be changed in pathophysiological states, which may also involve spinal and sympathetic pathways rather than vagal pathways. For example, it has been shown in other systems, such as a neuropathic pain model, that WIN 55,212-2 reduces the hyperalgesia that develops after sciatic nerve ligation and reduces the levels of pronociceptive substances, such as prostaglandin E2 (Costa et al., 2004). In addition, since the CB1R and vanilloid receptor (Roberts et al., 2004) are colocalized in dorsal root ganglion, CB1R modulation may have benefit in pain-related states. Finally, inflammation induced by croton oil increased CB1R expression, and CBR agonists were more effective at reducing intestinal motility in inflamed than in control animals (Izzo et al., 2001).

Probably all levels of the brain-gut axis can be modulated by exogenous and endogenous CBR agonists (Figure 2), and so far, the evidence indicates that the ultimate effect on the organ is similar, no matter where the specific site of action(s) are. This makes the cannabinoid system quite attractive to target since a drug should have a similar effect whether it modulates the EC system locally in the gut or more remotely in the brain. The case can be made for beneficial effects of agonists (antiemetic and antimotility) and antagonists (anorexic and to prevent GI stasis/hypomotility) in this regard.
Figure 2 Figure 2
Schema that summarizes the main site(s) of action of cannabinoids on CB1R (open arrowhead) and immunocytochemical localization of CBR1 (stipple). Arrows indicate motility effects, except H+ refers to gastric acid secretion and Isc intestinal ion transport. (more ...)


Endocannabinoids and the gut

The dose-limiting psychotropic adverse effects of potent CB1R agonists restrict their therapeutic utility. In addition, most available agents are highly lipophilic and therefore penetrate centrally, even though the sites of action for their therapeutic effects are less protected by the blood-brain barrier, such as within the dorsal vagal complex, or peripherally on extrinsic nerves or on intrinsic enteric neurones. Therefore, recent efforts towards modulation of the CB1R have focused on the EC system.

The data reviewed above indicate that selective antagonists/inverse agonists of CB1R, such as rimonibant, have been critical not only for demonstrating CB1R selectivity of the observed effects, but also to demonstrate endogenous tone of bound CB1R, or a tonic spontaneous level of activity of unbound CB1R. A neutral antagonist will only prevent the activation of the receptor in the presence of the agonist. Inverse agonists will decrease the tonic level of activation of the receptor in the absence of the agonist. In general, inverse agonism in GPCRs has only unequivocally been demonstrated in cell systems where there is overexpression of the receptor or the mutated active receptor. Therefore, in functional studies where rimonibant alone is effective, it is not certain that it is acting as an inverse agonist of the CB1R in the absence of EC. For the purposes of this review, we will take the most conservative interpretation of effects of rimonibant in vivo, that tonic EC release is being antagonized at the CB1R.

In the majority of studies reviewed above, rimonibant given alone has effects opposite to that evoked by CB1R agonists (with a few exceptions, where there is no effect, such as found in Partosoedarso et al., 2003b). This suggests that throughout the GI tract CB1R are tonically active due to underlying EC release. However, what is not clear is whether EC are released constitutively or only in response to perturbation of the physiological system. For example, large doses of rimonibant cause vomiting in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva) with maximal response at 20 mg−1 kg (Darmani et al., 2003a). In other species, CB1R antagonists alone have no effect (Darmani, 2001; Van Sickle et al., 2001; 2003; Darmani et al., 2003b). These data can be reconciled if one speculates that there is a high degree of ongoing emetic signalling in the least shrew, and that this stimulus is being attenuated by a relatively high level of EC release. In ferret, CB1R antagonists given alone are not emetogenic in the absence of emetic stimulation, but potentiate the emesis in response to 6 morphine-glucuronide (Van Sickle et al., 2001). In this species, maybe emetic stimulation is required to increase the level of EC release such that the antagonist increases emesis. However, it is not known whether there is constitutive EC release within these pathways, or whether neuronal activation is essential for EC release in most cases. In isolated muscle preparations where CB1R antagonists have effects, it is often in the presence of chemical or electrical field stimulation. The presynaptic anterograde action of CB1R activation suggests that EC release would be quiescent until the neuronal circuitry is recruited. This would appear to be the case in several animal models of diarrhea. For example, an acute model of cholera toxin increased fluid accumulation in the small intestine was correlated with an increase in AEA released and the expression of CB1R mRNA locally (Izzo et al., 2003). The extent to which EC system is engaged in experimental models seems to depend on the pathophysiological condition. For example, when upper GI transit was enhanced after oral administration of the inflammation-evoking irritant croton oil, the ED50 for WIN 55,212-2 was more than two fold less than in control mice, suggesting a robust increase in CB1R efficiency or number (Izzo et al., 2000). However, after castor oil administration there was little antidiarrheal effect of CB1R agonists (Izzo et al., 1999b).

Higher concentrations of AEA can also mediate effects that are not reversed by CB1R antagonist, rimonibant but which may be due to actions on the vanilloid receptor. For example, in the guinea-pig myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation, AEA inhibited electrically evoked contractions with a pEC50 of 5.2, and acetylcholine release with a pEC50 of 5.8 (Mang et al., 2001) and addition of rimonibant resulted in the expected rightward shift in the dose – response curves. In contrast, AEA increased basal acetylcholine release and resting longitundial muscle tone with a pEC50 of 6.3 for both responses (Mang et al., 2001). These effects of AEA on basal tone and acetylcholine release were reversed by capsazepine, which is a vanilloid receptor antagonist, and tachykinin (NK1 and 3) receptor antagonists, but not by rimonibant (Mang et al., 2001). The effects of AEA on evoked muscle contraction were not reversed by capsezipine. The investigators conclude that AEA increases basal acetylcholine release via a non-CB1R-mediated mechanism that could involve vanilloid receptors on primary afferent nerves (Mang et al., 2001). Additional support for a role of AEA on extrinsic primary afferents comes from a study using an acute model of ileitis (McVey et al., 2003). Both AEA (30 and 100 μg) and 2-AG (10 and 100 μg) given intraluminally increased myeloperoxidase levels and fluid accumulation and both these effects were reversed by pretreatment of rats with subcutaneous capsezepine (McVey et al., 2003). Intraluminal CB1R agonists did not mimic the effects of the ECs. They further showed that intraluminal AEA induced neurokinin receptor internalization in myenteric neurons (used as a measure of substance P release) and they conclude that a likely scenario is that at the concentration of AEA and 2-AG applied intraluminal activated vanilloid receptors resulting in SP release and subsequent neurogenic inflammation.

Antagonists have demonstrated the presence of the EC system and its role in GI functions, however, therapeutic benefits of EC that have been discussed here involve increasing their levels, rather than antagonizing the CB1R. Therefore, in the last section we will discuss the various metabolic pathways that govern synthesis, release, uptake, and degradation that regulate the activity of the EC system. The proteins involved in these pathways, as well as their regulation, provide possible targets for diseases in which EC signaling is implicated.

Synthesis of AEA and 2-AG
Two pathways have been shown biochemically to produce AEA: (1) condensation of ethanolamine with arachidonic acid by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), and (2) transacylation by N-acyltransferase to form N-arachidonoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), which is followed by phospholipase D (PLD)-catalyzed release of AEA. Although the former reaction has been demonstrated in testis membranes (Schmid et al., 1998) and has been confirmed with recombinant FAAH enzyme (Kurahashi et al., 1997), the high Km for ethanolamine in vitro suggests that it is the latter reaction that is physiologically relevant. With regard to the transferase-phosphodiesterase reaction pathway, relevant substrates, enzyme activities, and products have been demonstrated in various tissues, including brain (Cadas et al., 1997) and testis (Sugiura et al., 2002). Consistent with the idea that the EC system is activated in response to neural activity, N-arachidonoyl PE accumulates during neural injury (Hansen et al., 2001) and N-acyltransferase enzyme activity is regulated by calcium (Cadas et al., 1997), as well as by activation of neurotransmitter receptors (Stella & Piomelli, 2001).

In contrast to AEA, 2-AG has more synthetic pathways, and these are dependent on the type of cell and tissue (Sugiura et al., 2002). Levels of 2-AG are elevated by increased calcium (Bisogno et al., 1997), activation of NMDA receptors (Stella & Piomelli, 2001), and in response to lipopolysaccharide (Di Marzo et al., 1999).

Little is known about the mechanism whereby ECs are released from the cell. In the section below, we will discuss uptake of EC's through an anandamide membrane transporter. This transporter may be bidirectional (Figure 3) and facilitate release of AEA (Hillard et al., 1997; Hillard & Jarrahian, 2003), however this mechanism is controversial. Once released, EC's appear to remain localized at the site since there is synapse-specific inhibition of neurotransmitter release in cerebellar slices (Brown et al., 2003).
Figure 3 Figure 3
Activity-dependent depolarization of a presynaptic neurone causes neurotransmitter release, which after binding to its receptor on the postsynaptic neurone, causes calcium influx. Increased calcium activates N-acyltransferase (NAT), which results in production (more ...)

Uptake and breakdown of AEA and 2-AG
The mechanisms involved in EC catabolism are of great interest due to the possibility of interfering with these functions in order to enhance levels of extracellular EC, for treatment of diseases. Inactivation of EC signaling is dependent on cellular uptake, localization to appropriate intracellular compartments, and FAAH-mediated hydrolysis. This latter reaction produces arachidonic acid, and either ethanolamine (from AEA) or glycerol (from 2-AG). ECs can also be metabolized by fatty acid oxygenases (Kozak & Marnett, 2002). Although it is generally recognized that there is uptake, intracellular transport, and hydrolysis of ECs, it is only the hydrolysis step that has a definitively assigned protein (FAAH). The mechanisms underlying the movement of AEA across plasma membranes is highly controversial and is the subject of several recent reviews (Hillard & Jarrahian, 2000; 2003; Fowler & Jacobsson, 2002). Several proteins, acting alone or in conjunction, could account for AEA uptake, these being a membrane transporter, intracellular binding proteins, and FAAH (Figure 3). Consistent with the presence of a membrane transporter is the reduction of AEA uptake with selective transport inhibitors (Lopez-Rodriguez et al., 2003). Intracellular binding proteins are supported by the role of fatty acyl Co-A synthase in uptake of long chain fatty acids (Schaffer & Lodish, 1994). Finally, FAAH can be a driving force for uptake of AEA since there is increased AEA uptake in cell lines that have been transfected with FAAH (Day et al., 2001). Other possible intracellular ‘sinks' for ECs are enzymes involved in esterification of fatty acids into acylglycerols and phospholipids. Consistent with this idea is the finding that the arachidonic acid moiety of 2-AG is hydrolyzed and incorporated into phospholipids and monoacylglycerols of astrocytoma cells. This process can be blocked with triacsin C, an acyl Co-A synthetase inhibitor, suggesting that esterification of arachidonic acid is a driving force for 2-AG uptake (Beltramo & Piomelli, 2000). Of all the potential ways of increasing EC in the cell discussed above, research interest has focused on FAAH (Bisogno et al., 2002). Briefly, FAAH is a membrane-associated protein that is localized to internal membranes, such as the endoplasmic reticulum, where it is active (Figure 3). FAAHs broad substrate specificity allows it to hydrolyze AEA, 2-AG, N-palmitoylethanolamine, and oleamide (Bisogno et al., 2002). Although 2-AG can be hydrolyzed by FAAH, it is largely metabolized by monoacylglycerol lipase (Goparaju et al., 1999; Dinh et al., 2002). Small molecule inhibitors of FAAH have a wide variety of mechanisms, with the most potent compounds binding irreversibly to serine 241 (Deutsch et al., 2002). Although these compounds hold much promise for therapeutic strategies aimed at elevating EC levels, the caveat is that the enzyme is widely distributed and it may be involved in more than just catabolism of EC.

GI effects of modulation of uptake, synthesis/degradation of EC
Emerging data do support the idea that agents which alter the synthesis and uptake of EC have efficacy in models of GI dysfunction. For example, cholera toxin induced fluid accumulation in the small intestine was prevented by VDM11, a selective inhibitor of AEA uptake, and this effect was reversed by rimonibant (Izzo et al., 2003). This suggests that the stimulus was associated with an increase of EC signaling which has an antisecretory role in the small intestine. Preliminary data suggest that VDM11 given alone increased gastric volume in anesthetized rats and that this effect was also dependent on CB1R activation since it was reversed by rimonibant (Partosoedarso et al., 2003a). This result is interesting since it provides evidence for EC constitutive release to promote increased gastric volume in a normal nonpathological system. Another example of this is that the rate of expulsion of a glass bead inserted into the distal colon seems to be under EC control because the rate was decreased by VDM11 (Pinto et al., 2002b). In addition, there are high amounts of 2-AG and AEA in the colon, as well as a high level of activity of FAAH (Pinto et al., 2002b). The small intestine in rats has also been demonstrated to have a high level of mRNA for FAAH (Katayama et al., 1997). Thus, the components are in place within the intestines to suggest that constitutive release of EC tonically inhibits propulsive activity. But this may be a disadvantage if a pathophysiological state involves stasis of the GI tract. For example, acetic acid-induced intestinal hypomotility, which is a model for paralytic ileus, is worsened by VDM-11 (Mascolo et al., 2002). One final caveat is that EC may act on non-CBR in order to mediate GI effects. For example, palmitoylethanolamide decreases intestinal transit in mice (Capasso et al., 2001), and 2-AG acts on myenteric cholinergic neurones to produce contract longitudinal muscle of the guinea-pig distal colon (Kojima et al., 2002). However, these effects were not reversed by selective antagonists, therefore modulation of the pathways for uptake and degradation of EC may mediate effects that are not related to CBR.


Conclusion

In conclusion, tremendous progress has been made in the last decade to demonstrate the role and site of action of CBR agonists in many aspects of GI function. The beneficial effects of CB1R activation in animal models include reduction of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, increased compliance of the proximal stomach, reduced acid secretion, reduction of GI transit, reduced intestinal fluid secretion in response to secretogogues and reduced large intestinal propulsive activity are all aspects that could be beneficial in functional bowel disorders such as IBS. However, administration of CB1R agonists to patients would be associated with CBS adverse effects due to the psychotropic actions. It is not clear to what extent increasing the release, or reducing the uptake of ECs would be beneficial for treatment of GI disorders. However, there is emerging evidence for tonic EC release in both physiological and pathophysiological systems suggests that these are important molecules in control of the GI tract. Newer approaches to their modulation by inhibition of FAAH or the uptake mechanisms hold promise for future therapeutic avenues. However, whether these approaches can be successful depends on minimizing CNS adverse effects, and it is not known whether such manipulation would also evoke psychotropic central effects associated with CB1R activation. The ideal approach would be to increase the levels of ECs within the dorsal vagal complex (an region that is less protected by the blood–brain- barrier), the vagal pathways, the dorsal root ganglion and within the enteric nervous system, without affecting higher brain function. This would hold the greatest promise for minimizing risks while treating or ameliorating the symptoms of complicated disorders with unclear etiology such as IBS.


References

* ADAMI, M.; CORUZZI, G.; SOLDANI, G.; TODOROV, S.; ZAMFIROVA, R.; STAVREV, E.; BROWN, D.R.; KULKARNI-NARLA, A. Investigation of CB1R cannabinoid receptos mediating antisecretory effects in rat stomach. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001;133:244P.
* ADAMI, M.; FRATI, P.; BERTINI, S.; KULKARNI-NARLA, A.; BROWN, D.R.; DE CARO, G.; CORUZZI, G.; SOLDANI, G. Gastric antisecretory role and immunohistochemical localization of cannabinoid receptors in the rat stomach. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002;135:1598–1606. [PubMed]
* BALL, A.J.; MOERSCHBAECHER, J.M.; HORNBY, P.J. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol effects on gastric motility are mediated by a capsacin-sensitive vagal pathway. Digestion. 2001;63:269.
* BARTHO, L.; BENKO, R.; LAZAR, Z.; ILLENYI, L.; HORVATH, O.P. Nitric oxide is involved in the relaxant effect of capsaicin in the human sigmoid colon circular muscle. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2002;366:496–500. [PubMed]
* BELTRAMO, M.; PIOMELLI, D. Carrier-mediated transport and enzymatic hydrolysis of the endogenous cannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol. Neuroreport. 2000;11:1231–1235. [PubMed]
* BISOGNO, T.; DE PETROCELLIS, L.; DI MARZO, V. Fatty acid amide hydrolase, an enzyme with many bioactive substrates. Possible therapeutic implications. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2002;8:533–547. [PubMed]
* BISOGNO, T.; SEPE, N.; MELCK, D.; MAURELLI, S.; DE PETROCELLIS, L.; DI MARZO, V. Biosynthesis, release and degradation of the novel endogenous cannabimimetic metabolite 2-arachidonoylglycerol in mouse neuroblastoma cells. Biochem. J. 1997;322 Part 2:671–677. [PubMed]
* BROWN, S.P.; BRENOWITZ, S.D.; REGEHR, W.G. Brief presynaptic bursts evoke synapse-specific retrograde inhibition mediated by endogenous cannabinoids. Nat. Neurosci. 2003;6:1048–1057. [PubMed]
* BURDYGA, G.; LAL, S.; VARRO, A.; DIMALINE, R.; THOMPSON, D.G.; DOCKRAY, G.J. Expression of cannbinoid CB1 receptors by vagal afferent neurons is inhibited by cholecystokinin. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:2708–2715. [PubMed]
* CADAS, H.; DI TOMASO, E.; PIOMELLI, D. Occurrence and biosynthesis of endogenous cannabinoid precursor, N-arachidonoyl phosphatidylethanolamine, in rat brain. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:1226–1242. [PubMed]
* CAPASSO, R.; IZZO, A.A.; FEZZA, F.; PINTO, A.; CAPASSO, F.; MASCOLO, N.; DI MARZO, V. Inhibitory effect of palmitoylethanolamide on gastrointestinal motility in mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001;134:945–950. [PubMed]
* CASU, M.A.; PORCELLA, A.; RUIU, S.; SABA, P.; MARCHESE, G.; CARAI, M.A.; REALI, R.; GESSA, G.L.; PANI, L. Differential distribution of functional cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the mouse gastroenteric tract. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2003;459:97–105. [PubMed]
* CICHEWICZ, D.L.; WELCH, S.P. Modulation of oral morphine antinociceptive tolerance and naloxone-precipitated withdrawal signs by oral Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003;305:812–817. [PubMed]
* CORUZZI, G.; ADAMI, M.; COPPELLI, G.; FRATI, P.; SOLDANI, G. Inhibitory effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 on pentagastrin-induced gastric acid secretion in the anaesthetized rat. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 1999;360:715–718. [PubMed]
* COSTA, B.; COLLEONI, M.; CONTI, S.; TROVATO, A.E.; BIANCHI, M.; SOTGIU, M.L.; GIAGNONI, G. Repeated treatment with the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 reduces both hyperalgesia and production of pronociceptive mediators in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004;141:4–8. [PubMed]
* COUTTS, A.A.; IRVING, A.J.; MACKIE, K.; PERTWEE, R.G.; ANAVI-GOFFER, S. Localisation of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor immunoreactivity in the guinea pig and rat myenteric plexus. J. Comp. Neurol. 2002;448:410–422. [PubMed]
* COUTTS, A.A.; PERTWEE, R.G. Inhibition by cannabinoid receptor agonists of acetylcholine release from the guinea-pig myenteric plexus. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1997;121:1557–1566. [PubMed]
* DARMANI, N.A. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A reverses the antiemetic and motor depressant actions of WIN 55, 212-2. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001;430:49–58. [PubMed]
* DARMANI, N.A.; JANOYAN, J.J.; KUMAR, N.; CRIM, J.L. Behaviorally active doses of the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A increase brain serotonin and dopamine levels and turnover. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2003a;75:777–787. [PubMed]
* DARMANI, N.A.; SIM-SELLEY, L.J.; MARTIN, B.R.; JANOYAN, J.J.; CRIM, J.L.; PAREKH, B.; BREIVOGEL, C.S. Antiemetic and motor-depressive actions of CP55,940: cannabinoid CB1 receptor characterization, distribution, and G-protein activation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2003b;459:83–95. [PubMed]
* DAY, T.A.; RAKHSHAN, F.; DEUTSCH, D.G.; BARKER, E.L. Role of fatty acid amide hydrolase in the transport of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide. Mol. Pharmacol. 2001;59:1369–1375. [PubMed]
* DERBENEV, A.V.; SMITH, B.N. Endocannabinoids interact with CB1 and VR1 receptors on GABAergic synaptic terminals contacting rat vagal motor neurons. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 2003;33
* DERBENEV, A.V.; STUART, T.C.; SMITH, B.N. Alteration of synpatic transmission by cannabinoids in rat brainstem vagal complex. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 2002;32:830.
* DEUTSCH, D.G.; UEDA, N.; YAMAMOTO, S. The fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2002;66:201–210. [PubMed]
* DEVANE, W.A.; HANUS, L.; BREUER, A.; PERTWEE, R.G.; STEVENSON, L.A.; GRIFFIN, G.; GIBSON, D.; MANDELBAUM, A.; ETINGER, A.; MECHOULAM, R. Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science. 1992;258:1946–1949. [PubMed]
* DI CARLO, G.; IZZO, A.A. Cannabinoids for gastrointestinal diseases: potential therapeutic applications. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2003;12:39–49.
* DI MARZO, V.; BISOGNO, T.; DE PETROCELLIS, L.; MELCK, D.; ORLANDO, P.; WAGNER, J.A.; KUNOS, G. Biosynthesis and inactivation of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol in circulating and tumoral macrophages. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999;264:258–267. [PubMed]
* DINH, T.P.; CARPENTER, D.; LESLIE, F.M.; FREUND, T.F.; KATONA, I.; SENSI, S.L.; KATHURIA, S.; PIOMELLI, D. Brain monoglyceride lipase participating in endocannabinoid inactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99:10819–10824. [PubMed]
* EARLEYWINE, M. Understanding Marijuana. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
* FOWLER, C.J.; JACOBSSON, S.O. Cellular transport of anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol and palmitoylethanolamide – targets for drug development. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2002;66:193–200. [PubMed]
* FREUND, T.F.; KATONA, I.; PIOMELLI, D. Role of endogenous cannabinoids in synaptic signaling. Physiol. Rev. 2003;83:1017–1066. [PubMed]
* FRIDE, E. Endocannabinoids in the central nervous system–an overview. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2002;66:221–233. [PubMed]
* GERARD, C.M.; MOLLEREAU, C.; VASSART, G.; PARMENTIER, M. Molecular cloning of a human cannabinoid receptor which is also expressed in testis. Biochem. J. 1991;279 Part 1:129–134. [PubMed]
* GERMANO, M.P.; D'ANGELO, V.; MONDELLO, M.R.; PERGOLIZZI, S.; CAPASSO, F.; CAPASSO, R.; IZZO, A.A.; MASCOLO, N.; DE PASQUALE, R. Cannabinoid CB1-mediated inhibition of stress-induced gastric ulcers in rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2001;363:241–244. [PubMed]
* GOPARAJU, S.K.; UEDA, N.; TANIGUCHI, K.; YAMAMOTO, S. Enzymes of porcine brain hydrolyzing 2-arachidonoylglycerol, an endogenous ligand of cannabinoid receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1999;57:417–423. [PubMed]
* HANSEN, H.H.; IKONOMIDOU, C.; BITTIGAU, P.; HANSEN, S.H.; HANSEN, H.S. Accumulation of the anandamide precursor and other N-acylethanolamine phospholipids in infant rat models of in vivo necrotic and apoptotic neuronal death. J. Neurochem. 2001;76:39–46. [PubMed]
* HANUS, L.; ABU-LAFI, S.; FRIDE, E.; BREUER, A.; VOGEL, Z.; SHALEV, D.E.; KUSTANOVICH, I.; MECHOULAM, R. 2-arachidonyl glyceryl ether, an endogenous agonist of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001;98:3662–3665. [PubMed]
* HEINEMANN, A.; Shahbazian, A.; HOLZER, P. Cannabinoid inhibition of guinea-pig intestinal peristalsis via inhibition of excitatory and activation of inhibitory neural pathways. Neuropharmacology. 1999;38:1289–1297. [PubMed]
* HILLARD, C.J.; EDGEMOND, W.S.; JARRAHIAN, A.; CAMPBELL, W.B. Accumulation of N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide) into cerebellar granule cells occurs via facilitated diffusion. J. Neurochem. 1997;69:631–638. [PubMed]
* HILLARD, C.J.; JARRAHIAN, A. Cellular accumulation of anandamide: consensus and controversy. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2003;140:802–808. [PubMed]
* HILLARD, C.J.; JARRAHIAN, A. The movement of N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide) across cellular membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2000;108:123–134. [PubMed]
* HINE, B.; FRIEDMAN, E.; TORRELIO, M.; GERSHON, S. Morphine-dependent rats: blockade of precipitated abstinence by tetrahydrocannabinol. Science. 1975;187:443–445. [PubMed]
* HOHMANN, A.G.; HERKENHAM, M. Localization of central cannabinoid CB1 receptor messenger RNA in neuronal subpopulations of rat dorsal root ganglia: a double-label in situ hybridization study. Neuroscience. 1999;90:923–931. [PubMed]
* HOLLOWAY, R.H.; DENT, J. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux. Lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 1990;19:517–535.
* HORNBY, P.J. Central neurocircuitry associated with emesis. Am. J. Med. 2001;111:106S–112S. [PubMed]
* HORNBY, P.J.; ABRAHAMS, T.P.; PARTOSOEDARSO, E.R. Central mechanisms of lower esophageal sphincter control Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2002. 31:S11–S20.v-vi.
* IZZO, A.A.; CAPASSO, F.; COSTAGLIOLA, A.; BISOGNO, T.; MARSICANO, G.; LIGRESTI, A.; MATIAS, I.; CAPASSO, R.; PINTO, L.; BORRELLI, F.; CECIO, A.; LUTZ, B.; MASCOLO, N.; DI MARZO, V. An endogenous cannabinoid tone attenuates cholera toxin-induced fluid accumulation in mice. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:765–774. [PubMed]
* IZZO, A.A.; FEZZA, F.; CAPASSO, R.; BISOGNO, T.; PINTO, L.; IUVONE, T.; ESPOSITO, G.; MASCOLO, N.; DI MARZO, V.; CAPASSO, F. Cannabinoid CB1-receptor mediated regulation of gastrointestinal motility in mice in a model of intestinal inflammation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001;134:563–570. [PubMed]
* IZZO, A.A.; MASCOLO, N.; CAPASSO, R.; GERMANO, M.P.; DE PASQUALE, R.; CAPASSO, F. Inhibitory effect of cannabinoid agonists on gastric emptying in the rat. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 1999a;360:221–223. [PubMed]
* IZZO, A.A.; MASCOLO, N.; PINTO, L.; CAPASSO, R.; CAPASSO, F. The role of cannabinoid receptors in intestinal motility, defaecation and diarrhoea in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1999b;384:37–42. [PubMed]
* IZZO, A.A.; PINTO, L.; BORRELLI, F.; CAPASSO, R.; MASCOLO, N.; CAPASSO, F. Central and peripheral cannabinoid modulation of gastrointestinal transit in physiological states or during the diarrhoea induced by croton oil. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000;129:1627–1632. [PubMed]
* JARBE, T.U.; SHEPPARD, R.; LAMB, R.J.; MAKRIYANNIS, A.; LIN, S.; GOUTOPOULOS, A. Effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and ®-methanandamide on open-field behavior in rats. Behav. Pharmacol. 1998;9:169–174. [PubMed]
* KATAYAMA, K.; UEDA, N.; KURAHASHI, Y.; SUZUKI, H.; YAMAMOTO, S.; KATO, I. Distribution of anandamide amidohydrolase in rat tissues with special reference to small intestine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1997;1347:212–218. [PubMed]
* KOJIMA, S.; SUGIURA, T.; WAKU, K.; KAMIKAWA, Y. Contractile response to a cannabimimetic eicosanoid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, of longitudinal smooth muscle from the guinea-pig distal colon in vitro. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2002;444:203–207. [PubMed]
* KOZAK, K.R.; MARNETT, L.J. Oxidative metabolism of endocannabinoids. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2002;66:211–220. [PubMed]
* KROWICKI, Z.K.; MOERSCHBAECHER, J.M.; WINSAUER, P.J.; DIGAVALLI, S.V.; HORNBY, P.J. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol inhibits gastric motility in the rat through cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1999;371:187–196. [PubMed]
* KULKARNI-NARLA, A.; BROWN, D.R. Localization of CB1-cannabinoid receptor immunoreactivity in the porcine enteric nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 2000;302:73–80. [PubMed]
* KURAHASHI, Y.; UEDA, N.; SUZUKI, H.; SUZUKI, M.; YAMAMOTO, S. Reversible hydrolysis and synthesis of anandamide demonstrated by recombinant rat fatty-acid amide hydrolase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997;237:512–515. [PubMed]
* LEGGETT, J.D.; ASPLEY, S.; BECKETT, S.R.; D'ANTONA, A.M.; KENDALL, D.A. Oleamide is a selective endogenous agonist of rat and human CB1 cannabinoid receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004;141:253–262. [PubMed]
* LEHMANN, A.; BLACKSHAW, L.A.; BRANDEN, L.; CARLSSON, A.; JENSEN, J.; NYGREN, E.; SMID, S.D. Cannabinoid receptor agonism inhibits transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux in dogs. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1129–1134. [PubMed]
* LIDUMS, I.; LEHMANN, A.; CHECKLIN, H.; DENT, J.; HOLLOWAY, R.H. Control of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux by the GABA(cool.gif agonist baclofen in normal subjects. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:7–13. [PubMed]
* LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ, M.L.; VISO, A.; ORTEGA-GUTIERREZ, S.; FOWLER, C.J.; TIGER, G.; DE LAGO, E.; FERNANDEZ-RUIZ, J.; RAMOS, J.A. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of new inhibitors of the endocannabinoid uptake: comparison with effects on fatty acid amidohydrolase. J. Med. Chem. 2003;46:1512–1522. [PubMed]
* MACNAUGHTON, W.K.; VAN SICKLE, M.D.; KEENAN, C.M.; CUSHING, K.; MACKIE, K.; SHARKEY, K.A. Distribution and function of the cannabinoid-1 receptor in the modulation of ion transport in the guinea pig ileum: relationship to capsaicin-sensitive nerves Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004(in press).
* MANARA, L.; CROCI, T.; GUAGNINI, F.; RINALDI-CARMONA, M.; MAFFRAND, J.P.; LE FUR, G.; MUKENGE, S.; FERLA, G. Functional assessment of neuronal cannabinoid receptors in the muscular layers of human ileum and colon. Dig. Liver Dis. 2002;34:262–269. [PubMed]
* MANCINELLI, R.; FABRIZI, A.; DEL MONACO, S.; AZZENA, G.B.; VARGIU, R.; COLOMBO, G.C.; GESSA, G.L. Inhibition of peristaltic activity by cannabinoids in the isolated distal colon of mouse. Life Sci. 2001;69:101–111. [PubMed]
* MANG, C.F.; ERBELDING, D.; KILBINGER, H. Differential effects of anandamide on acetylcholine release in the guinea-pig ileum mediated via vanilloid and non-CB1 cannabinoid receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001;134:161–167. [PubMed]
* MASCOLO, N.; IZZO, A.A.; LIGRESTI, A.; COSTAGLIOLA, A.; PINTO, L.; CASCIO, M.G.; MAFFIA, P.; CECIO, A.; CAPASSO, F.; DI MARZO, V. The endocannabinoid system and the molecular basis of paralytic ileus in mice. FASEB J. 2002;16:1973–1975. [PubMed]
* MATSUDA, L.A.; LOLAIT, S.J.; BROWNSTEIN, M.J.; YOUNG, A.C.; BONNER, T.I. Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA. Nature. 1990;346:561–564. [PubMed]
* MCCALLUM, R.W.; SOYKAN, I.; SRIDHAR, K.R.; RICCI, D.A.; LANGE, R.C.; PLANKEY, M.W. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol delays the gastric emptying of solid food in humans: a double-blind, randomized study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999;13:77–80.
* MCVEY, D.C.; SCHMID, P.C.; SCHMID, H.H.; VIGNA, S.R. Endocannabinoids induce ileitis in rats via the capsaicin receptor (VR1). J.Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003;304:713–722. [PubMed]
* MECHOULAM, R.; BEN-SHABAT, S.; HANUS, L.; LIGUMSKY, M.; KAMINSKI, N.E.; SCHATZ, A.R.; GOPHER, A.; ALMOG, S.; MARTIN, B.R.; COMPTON, D.R.; PERTWEE, R.G.; GRIFFIN, G.; BAYEWITCH, M.; BARG, J.; VOGEL, Z. Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995;50:83–90. [PubMed]
* MUNRO, S.; THOMAS, K.L.; ABU-SHAAR, M. Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids. Nature. 1993;365:61–65. [PubMed]
* NALIN, D.R.; LEVINE, M.M.; RHEAD, J.; BERGQUIST, E.; RENNELS, M.; HUGHES, T.; O'DONNEL, S.; HORNICK, R.B. Cannabis, hypochlorhydria, and cholera. Lancet. 1978;2:859–862.
* NAVARRO, M.; CHOWEN, J.; ROCIO, A.C.M.; DEL ARCO, I.; VILLANUA, M.A.; MARTIN, Y.; ROBERTS, A.J.; KOOB, G.F.; DE FONSECA, F.R. CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist-induced opiate withdrawal in morphine-dependent rats. NeuroReport. 1998;9:3397–3402. [PubMed]
* OKA, S.; TSUCHIE, A.; TOKUMURA, A.; MURAMATSU, M.; SUHARA, Y.; TAKAYAMA, H.; WAKU, K.; SUGIURA, T. Ether-linked analogue of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (noladin ether) was not detected in the brains of various mammalian species. J. Neurochem. 2003;85:1374–1381. [PubMed]
* O'SHAUGHNESSY, W.B. On the preparation of Indian hemp or gunjah (Cannibis indica): the effects on the animal system in health, and their utility in the treatment of tetanus and other convulsant diseases. Trans. Med. Phys. Soc. Bombay. 1842;8:421–461.
* PARKER, L.A.; KEMP, S.W. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) interferes with conditioned retching in Suncus murinus: an animal model of anticipatory nausea and vomiting (ANV). NeuroReport. 2001;12:749–751. [PubMed]
* PARKER, L.A.; KWIATKOWSKA, M.; BURTON, P.; MECHOULAM, R. Effect of cannabinoids on lithium-induced vomiting in the Suncus murinus (house musk shrew). Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 2004;171:156–161. [PubMed]
* PARKER, L.A.; MECHOULAM, R.; SCHLIEVERT, C. Cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive component of cannabis and its synthetic dimethylheptyl homolog suppress nausea in an experimental model with rats. NeuroReport. 2002;13:567–570. [PubMed]
* PARKER, L.A.; MECHOULAM, R.; SCHLIEVERT, C.; ABBOTT, L.; FUDGE, M.L.; BURTON, P. Effects of cannabinoids on lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions in a rat model of nausea. Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 2003;166:156–162. [PubMed]
* PAROLARO, D.; MASSI, P.; RUBINO, T.; MONTI, E. Endocannabinoids in the immune system and cancer. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2002;66:319–332. [PubMed]
* PARTOSOEDARSO, E.; DINH, N.T.; HORNBY, P.J. Endocannabinoids can alter gastric volume via CB1 receptors in rats. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003a;15:215.
* PARTOSOEDARSO, E.R.; ABRAHAMS, T.P.; SCULLION, R.T.; MOERSCHBAECHER, J.M.; HORNBY, P.J. Cannabinoid1 receptor in the dorsal vagal complex modulates lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation in ferrets. J. Physiol. 2003b;550:149–158. [PubMed]
* PERTWEE, R.G. Cannabinoids and the gastrointestinal tract. Gut. 2001;48:859–867. [PubMed]
* PERTWEE, R.G.; FERNANDO, S.R.; NASH, J.E.; COUTTS, A.A. Further evidence for the presence of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in guinea-pig small intestine. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1996;118:2199–2205. [PubMed]
* PINTO, L.; CAPASSO, R.; DI CARLO, G.; IZZO, A.A. Endocannabinoids and the gut. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2002a;66:333–341. [PubMed]
* PINTO, L.; IZZO, A.A.; CASCIO, M.G.; BISOGNO, T.; HOSPODAR-SCOTT, K.; BROWN, D.R.; MASCOLO, N.; DI MARZO, V.; CAPASSO, F. Endocannabinoids as physiological regulators of colonic propulsion in mice. Gastroenterology. 2002b;123:227–234. [PubMed]
* PORTER, A.C.; SAUER, J.M.; KNIERMAN, M.D.; BECKER, G.W.; BERNA, M.J.; BAO, J.; NOMIKOS, G.G.; CARTER, P.; BYMASTER, F.P.; LEESE, A.B.; FELDER, C.C. Characterization of a novel endocannabinoid, virodhamine, with antagonist activity at the CB1 receptor. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002;301:1020–1024. [PubMed]
* RICE, A.S.; FARQUHAR-SMITH, W.P.; NAGY, I. Endocannabinoids and pain: spinal and peripheral analgesia in inflammation and neuropathy. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2002;66:243–256. [PubMed]
* ROBERTS, J.C.; DAVIS, J.B.; BENHAM, C.D. [3H]Resiniferatoxin autoradiography in the CNS of wild-type and DIARRHOEA null mice defines DIARRHOEA (VR-1) protein distribution. Brain Res. 2004;995:176–183. [PubMed]
* ROFFMAN, R.A. Marijuana as Medicine. Seattle: Madrona Publishers; 1982.
* SCHAFFER, J.E.; LODISH, H.F. Expression cloning and characterization of a novel adipocyte long chain fatty acid transport protein. Cell. 1994;79:427–436. [PubMed]
* SCHMID, P.C.; SCHWINDENHAMMER, D.; KREBSBACH, R.J.; SCHMID, H.H. Alternative pathways of anandamide biosynthesis in rat testes. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 1998;92:27–35. [PubMed]
* SHOOK, J.E.; BURKS, T.F. Psychoactive cannabinoids reduce gastrointestinal propulsion and motility in rodents. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1989;249:444–449. [PubMed]
* SIMONEAUII; HAMZA, M.S.; MATA, H.P.; SIEGEL, E.M.; VANDERAH, T.W.; PORRECA, F.; MAKRIYANNIS, A; MALAN, T.P., Jr The cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 suppresses opioid-induced emesis in ferrets. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:882–887. [PubMed]
* STELLA, N.; PIOMELLI, D. Receptor-dependent formation of endogenous cannabinoids in cortical neurons. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001;425:189–196. [PubMed]
* STORR, M.; SIBAEV, A.; MARSICANO, G.; LUTZ, B.; SCHUSDZIARRA, V.; TIMMERMANS, J.P.; ALLESCHER, H.D. Cannabinoid receptor type 1 modulates excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission in mouse colon. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;286:G110–G117. [PubMed]
* SUGIURA, T.; KOBAYASHI, Y.; OKA, S.; WAKU, K. Biosynthesis and degradation of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol and their possible physiological significance. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2002;66:173–192. [PubMed]
* SUGIURA, T.; KONDO, S.; KISHIMOTO, S.; MIYASHITA, T.; NAKANE, S.; KODAKA, T.; SUHARA, Y.; TAKAYAMA, H.; WAKU, K. Evidence that 2-arachidonoylglycerol but not N-palmitoylethanolamine or anandamide is the physiological ligand for the cannabinoid CB2 receptor Comparison of the agonistic activities of various cannabinoid receptor ligands in HL-60 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:605–612. [PubMed]
* TRAMER, M.R.; CARROLL, D.; CAMPBELL, F.A.; REYNOLDS, D.J.; MOORE, R.A.; MCQUAY, H.J. Cannabinoids for control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: quantitative systematic review. BMJ. 2001;323:16–21.
* TRAVAGLI, R.A.; GILLIS, R.A.; ROSSITER, C.D.; VICINI, S. Glutamate and GABA-mediated synaptic currents in neurons of the rat dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus. Am. J. Physiol. 1991;260:G531–G536. [PubMed]
* TSOU, K.; NOGUERON, M.I.; MUTHIAN, S.; SANUDO-PENA, M.C.; HILLARD, C.J.; DEUTSCH, D.G.; WALKER, J.M. Fatty acid amide hydrolase is located preferentially in large neurons in the rat central nervous system as revealed by immunohistochemistry. Neurosci. Lett. 1998;254:137–140. [PubMed]
* TYLER, K.; HILLARD, C.J.; GREENWOOD-VAN MEERVELD, B. Inhibition of small intestinal secretion by cannabinoids is CB1 receptor-mediated in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2000;409:207–211. [PubMed]
* VAN SICKLE, M.D.; OLAND, L.D.; HO, W.; HILLARD, C.J.; MACKIE, K.; DAVISON, J.S.; SHARKEY, K.A. Cannabinoids inhibit emesis through CB1 receptors in the brainstem of the ferret. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:767–774. [PubMed]
* VAN SICKLE, M.D.; OLAND, L.D.; MACKIE, K.; DAVISON, J.S.; SHARKEY, K.A. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol selectively acts on CB1 receptors in specific regions of dorsal vagal complex to inhibit emesis in ferrets. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2003;285:G566–G576. [PubMed]
* ZHANG, Q.; LEHMANN, A.; RIGDA, R.; DENT, J.; HOLLOWAY, R.H. Control of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux by the GABA(cool.gif agonist baclofen in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut. 2002;50:19–24. [PubMed]

source: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlere...i?artid=1574910

 

 

 

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease May Respond To Cannabis-Derived Drugs

    BATH, England, Aug. 16-British researchers have found a cellular rationale for the use of cannabis-derived drugs, possibly even smoked marijuana, as an adjunct in treating inflammatory bowel disease.
    Action Points

    Investigating anecdotal reports that cannabis in the form of smoked marijuana relieves some of the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease, the researchers here tried to find out why that might be so.

    They performed histological examinations, signaling experiments, and wound healing experiments on healthy colon tissue samples and samples from patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

    Two potential targets for cannabis-derived drugs, the G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, are expressed in the human colon, Karen Wright, Ph.D., of the University of Bath here and colleagues reported in the August 2005 issue of the journal Gastroenterology.

    Furthermore, these receptors were activated by a variety of natural and synthetic cannabis-derived compounds and may play a role both in wound healing and in the body's response to inflammatory bowel disease, said the Bath team.

    The study did not address the issue of smoked marijuana directly, and an accompanying press release said smoking marijuana for inflammatory bowel disease would be inappropriate.

    In healthy tissue samples, the CB1 receptor was present in colonic epithelial and smooth muscle cells, while the CB2 receptor was identified in immune system cells including macrophages and plasma cells.

    In diseased tissue samples, the presence of CB2 increased significantly, and the receptor appeared in epithelial cells, most notably in cells bordering sites of ulceration.

    This evidence suggests that the CB2 receptor, which is known to play a role in suppressing the immune system, may be part of the body's attempt to bring inflammatory bowel disease under control and restore a healthy state in the gut, the researchers speculated.

    Signaling experiments showed that both receptors bound to and were activated by cannabinoids such as anandamide and noladin ether, indicating that the receptors were turned on in the human colon.

    Finally, wound-healing experiments performed on cultured cells indicated that CB1 agonists could promote wound closure, while CB2 agonists did not, suggesting that the CB1 receptor may play a role in healing ulcers caused by inflammatory bowel disease.

    Overall, the study provides further evidence that cannabinoids "may have a direct influence on the human large intestine" and may play a role in gastrointestinal physiology and pathophysiology. The CB1 and CB2 receptors may prove to be useful targets for cannabis-derived drugs for treating inflammatory bowel disease, the researchers concluded.

    source: http://www.medpagetoday.com/Gastroenterolo...welDisease/1548

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 All rights reserved.
Web Hosting by Yahoo!

 

 

 

 

 

OR